frank raud
Master of Arts
The only martial art I know of that originated from a woman is Wing Chun, according to a documentary by the History Channel I watched a while ago.
But I have been thinking during my hiatus from posting here. Would martial arts founded by women be more efficient for their intended purpose due to women not being able to rely on physical strength as much as men can?
By this, I mean that, biologically, men have sturdier frames and bigger physical prowess. Therefore, in order to be able to overcome this in a fight, logically (as shown by almost every martial style out there) technique steps in. But when you dissect the theory behind Wing Chun, the technique and knowledge and science present within it far outweighs that of any other styles that I am aware of. What are your thoughts on this?
Can you think of any martial arts that are more technical than Wing Chun?
Of course, I know many people call Wing Chun into question as it might not be applicable - but is this an inherent problem in the wushu style itself, or the in way in which it is taught?
In the West, the physical differences between male and female populations is more pronounced than it is in the Orient. Following your train of logic, any Oriental art designed (or evolved) to fight against Occidentals should be superior to anything the Westerners could come up with, as they would be more inclined to utilize brute force. Ergo, there should be very few world champions who are not Oriental. How's that working out in real life?