You don't want to believe me even though I had some experience in it so I point you to a credible forum where people who also haven't any experience(and maybe also those who do have some experience in it) "bash" it .
What is wrong with wing chun
- Thread starter DaveB
- Start date
If he could hold his own ,he wouldn't need to act all holy.Of course if you don't like what I say try complaining to the mods about me. Explain to them about him calling me a child first
Last edited:
I didn't say I don't believe you. I said there's no credibility in your claim. Pointing to other people with no experience who bash it does not add any credibility.
"I've never studied advanced physics - just what I learned in high school and college - but it doesn't really cover how isotopes decay."
"You are certain of that, even though you've only studied the rudiments?"
"Yes. And a bunch of people on the Philosophy forum say the same thing, so it must be true."
"You are certain of that, even though you've only studied the rudiments?"
"Yes. And a bunch of people on the Philosophy forum say the same thing, so it must be true."
Saying someone is not worth arguing with is not "all holy". That's pretty hyperbolic.If he could hold his own ,he wouldn't need to act all holy.Of course if you don't like what I say try complaining to the mods about me. Explain to them about him calling me a child first
I was pointing out that you don't have to be a member of WC to question it.
Agreed. But to make a claim that something isn't in there, when you haven't experienced the full curriculum is ludicrous.
That's what people who have holier than thou attitude behave. They can't dispute you. So they tell others to ignore you and then start mumbling to themselves
Last edited:
Like I said before, if someone doesn't believe me, perhaps I can demonstrate to them then they can decide if I have credibility or not. But we both know no one's gonna pay for the airfare.
So why say it?
Anyone can question another art, but you didn't question it, you argued you knew it better than those who study it.
The fact you don't know wing chun invalidates your opinion about what it contains or how you would use the art in a given situation.
The fact that you then tried to argue your view invalidates the benefit of the doubt most people would be inclined to give you.
I posted some on topic stuff but the discussion breezed past it.
Hopefully we'll return to topic soon.
Can you show me the 4th WC solo form that has footwork in it?
wckf92
Master of Arts
I don't know what you mean by "4th WC solo form"
But footwork is contained in CK, BJ, MYJ, and both weapons forms.
jobo
Grandmaster
thats why people laugh at wc, man beats up coat rack
Even the wooden dummy training, it doesn't include how to move in fast while your opponent moves back fast not just 1 step, not just 2 steps, but many steps.
jobo
Grandmaster
if they put the coat rack on wheels it would make it more realistic, that way when he kicks hr can chase it across the room
wckf92
Master of Arts
Perhaps you are interpreting things too literally.
IME, rapid footwork is in the weapons forms.
drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
The punches are still straight line so you get nailed in a counter punch. And the defensive system is over complicated.
Chunners really need to box. At the very least to understand why they are doing those movements in the form.
And stop fighting like this.
hahahaha love it. both fly in with bicycle punchesnon stop. nothing screams more WC then this match
