Hazardi172
Blue Belt
So you don't step in when you are too far away to land the punch? And again, how do you punch from far away as you stated before?
Movement of the body is part of the punch, as already discussed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you don't step in when you are too far away to land the punch? And again, how do you punch from far away as you stated before?
Ok Guy. No problem.
The VT punch can strike from close in to far out. You don't need a different strike. This is why we work so hard to perfect the punch ...the punch is the primary weapon in all situations!
As explained above, the VT punch doesn't have an ideal range. It is equally effective from close in to far out.This is becuse it doesn't rely upon rotation or other upper body momentum in order to work. It is as effective from almost zero extension to maximum extension. It lacks an ideal range by way of design.
The kick, faak, elbow, knee, and palm are the different strikes I spoke of. In some systems, they would also take that single punch and describe it as more than one, to discuss the differences in how it works at its extremes. That's semantics, only, but it may help to know that in future discussions. So, for instance, I may teach a "short vertical fist" and a "long vertical fist" to my students. They are the same strike, but different points can be emphasized at those extremes. There's no point along the continuum between the two where I could draw a line and say, "That's the long version there, and this is the short version here."The VT punch can strike from close in to far out because the body movement is part of the punch. You don't need a different strike. This is why we work so hard to perfect the punch
Of course we can also kick, faak, elbow, knee, palm. But the punch is the primary weapon in all situations!
Those are informative points. Thank you.I hope I have helped to clear up your confusion and that you are now closer to understanding a bit about the VT system . Let me know if you need me to explain more.
In order to strike "far out", yourThe VT punch can strike from close in to far out because the body movement is part of the punch. You don't need a different strike. This is why we work so hard to perfect the punch
Movement of the body is part of the punch, as already discussed
You didn't answer my questions. Just like Guy...ask a lot of questions but answer very few!
Hazard, I practice Yip Man VT ...but not the WSL lineage, so my perspective is a bit different. In the VT I train we work very hard at perfecting our punch, developing elbow power, and learning to punch with the body, not just the arm. But compared with long-bridge systems, our VT punch has a more specialized range. We are good at short-power, but since we do not extend our arm like long-bridge systems or blade our body like the JKD guys, we use our footwork to get into optimal range for punching.
At longer ranges, we use a longer range weapon, such as a kick to simultaneously attack and close. At very close , clinching ranges we often use elbows to simultaneously attack and create space for punches.
I find your statement that you can punch from any range ...without stepping(?) to be confusing. Please clarify!
Actually, you just defined its ideal range. I assume that like any other strike it can be used just outside that range (by slight over-extension) or just inside that range (the "almost zero" you mentioned), where it will have less power than within its prime range. There will be other sacrifices in some of those cases (the over-extension also sacrifices some structure), so practitioners may not choose to use some of those ranges, and may instead choose to stick to that ideal range.
Those are informative points. Thank you.
The punch works from elbow touching body, so no internal sub optimal range. Also no external sub optimal range as it ceases to function beyond maximum extension. However we are only talking about the arm movement here, not the punch. The punch also requires the momentum of the moving body, and the body is what you hit with rather than the arm. The step is part of the punch, meaning that it can be used from any meaningful range in fighting.
Glad to share, thanks
5086"]Yeah, trapping is sometimes seen as a close cousin of Chin-Na and sometimes goes so far as a very quick standing grappling.[/QUOTE]Should I assume that standup grappling is the aim of your wing chun? This is something new to me.
Hi Geezer, sounds great. Good to hear how your wing chun works. I didn't say to punch without stepping. The step is part of the punch, not to get into range to punch. The punch is with the moving body.
Let's ignore the body rotation, just look at the footwork (step). In order to punch your right hand, you can step in your right leg intoThe step is part of the punch, meaning that it can be used from any meaningful range in fighting.
The step is part of the punch, meaning that it can be used from any meaningful range in fighting.
This is the point. Maybe we are odd balls but I study Martial Arts to defend myself and others. If I was still the History teacher I would be pedaling my bicycle every hour available.It might not be in VT, but what if your opponent isn't playing your game?
Sorry, that's just semantics. You're still saying the same thing we have been saying. You are moving in with footwork until close enough for the punch to land. That punch isn't going to land from several feet away without you "moving your body" (stepping in with footwork) to the "sweet spot" where you are close enough for that punch to land. That is still closing the distance or range. If you start where you are close enough to land a kick but not close enough to land a punch without moving in (kicking range), then you are going to have to move into a range where you are close enough for the punch to contact (punching range). That's just a simple fact of physics whether you want to use that terminology or not.
Thanks for the clarification. This makes sense. Before I thought you were talking just about the arm ...and the VT punch I know, delivered with the shoulders square to the target, is a shorter punch than used in many other systems which throw the shoulder into the punch. But, as you are talking about the punch with stepping, we are talking the same language after all.
IMO, all 1, 2, 3 "strike far out" footwork are not emphasized in the WC system. In other words, compare WC to the other CMA systems, WC doesn't emphasize enough on "strike far out".
My last question @Hazardi172
How long have you been training VT now? Just curious what your experience is.....
Are you talking about boxing here or VT?
Sorry, WSLVT.