ShotoNoob
Master Black Belt
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,259
- Reaction score
- 72
|Mmm. I have to disagree. Okinawa has criteria to determine if karate styles are traditional. They only recognise four styles as traditional.
On how you define traditional karate, I accede. I'm not looking at the Okinawan Masters you particularly speak of as the defining judges of what is and what is not traditional karate. We have a definitional difference. You have much more in-depth knowledge of your defining principles I grant you that hands down.
|'tippy tappy' is the derogatory description of karate and TKD sparring introduced by on of the MMA is best brigade. Okinawan karate does not have 'tippy tappy'. They don't spar this way as a general principle. There are other ways they test their skills.
And I don't think "tippy tappy" is traditional karate--PERIOD. People in karate uniforms at karate schools sparring "tippy tappy" should NEVER use the word traditional and probably should STRIKE the word karate from their activity as well.
|Not at all. Now I'd never heard of Richard Heselton but I'm assuming he is a top competition competitor. Whether the baggers would call what he does 'tippy tappy' you would have to ask them. I think most of their posts are a disservice to all serious and dedicated practitioners. That's why I hold them in such low esteem.
Heselton practices a non-Okinawan style of karate. He's of English decent I think, but had worked his way to the top in the Japanese karate national tournaments. I don't abide by all of Heselton's training regiment but I respect his very high personal dedication & Achievement and he has won great respect from the official Japanese karate associations. He's a good example of revealing how prejudiced those 'baggers' kumite posts are .
|Agree totally, but the baggers continue to post the worst examples of any art they can find to make their point that all other arts suck.
Precisely. This is a main reason that I study Shotokan academically. Some of the practice of it is so bad. Very bad really. Yet Shotokan done well is really very effective. Of course we are back to a definition question of what is Shotokan "done well." I don't care for Shotokan myself, I think there's lots to criticize. Yet again, Shotokan done well is very effective, a very effective method of self defense for commom civil situations. Shotokan with it's heavy emphasis on proper body mechanics is well suited for MMA. The key is to train it competently, and Richard Heselton is a fine example of the Shotokan[?] karate style & conventions done well.
|
That's my opinion and I have plenty of company among Japan's reigning karateka.