glad2bhere
Master Black Belt
Dear Stuart:
"....Other wise I still don't see your point of all this......"
OK. Lets stop right here. I have stated my point in this at least three times and possibly more. Its not my fault if you don't want to hear what I am contributing.
1.) I have identified at least 6 "traditions". I put that term in quotes because, based on the way you folks are defining things you only want a very narrow definition of what you do and you only want to look at that through a very narrow lens.
2.) You want me to point out a discrete intersect between what one person is doing and another person is doing so to produce yet a third result. For example, Choi's tradition intersects with "TKD" at the point where Ji shows up and produces the Sin Mu Hapkido line. Korean traditions simply do not work that way. What you are asking for is an alien system that people have imposed on Korean traditions in much the same way as Kano imposed the belt system on Judo where in Japanese arts belt ranks were never used before.
3.) You folks seem to have a vested interest in holding on to a tightly defined discipline, and tightly defined ranks, and tightly defined organizations where there simply was no such traditions in Korean martial science. These are things that you want to be true about Korean culture because it is convenient to YOU and not because it is traditionally true.
4.) You folks want what you are learning to be Korean and not Japanese, even when the teacher tells you he is teaching Japanesde material. You want the traditions to start with Choi and not go further back. You want the curriculums to include some material and not other material all because its convenient to you and not because there is historical provenance for any other option.
5.) And in the end, when you are not able to tolerate continual challenges to how you see things. Instead of asking yourself to broaden your view you ask me to stop asking questions. How wonderfully American, Stuart, not to have to change but to ask reality to change in deference to you. FWIW.
Best Wishes,
Bruce
"....Other wise I still don't see your point of all this......"
OK. Lets stop right here. I have stated my point in this at least three times and possibly more. Its not my fault if you don't want to hear what I am contributing.
1.) I have identified at least 6 "traditions". I put that term in quotes because, based on the way you folks are defining things you only want a very narrow definition of what you do and you only want to look at that through a very narrow lens.
2.) You want me to point out a discrete intersect between what one person is doing and another person is doing so to produce yet a third result. For example, Choi's tradition intersects with "TKD" at the point where Ji shows up and produces the Sin Mu Hapkido line. Korean traditions simply do not work that way. What you are asking for is an alien system that people have imposed on Korean traditions in much the same way as Kano imposed the belt system on Judo where in Japanese arts belt ranks were never used before.
3.) You folks seem to have a vested interest in holding on to a tightly defined discipline, and tightly defined ranks, and tightly defined organizations where there simply was no such traditions in Korean martial science. These are things that you want to be true about Korean culture because it is convenient to YOU and not because it is traditionally true.
4.) You folks want what you are learning to be Korean and not Japanese, even when the teacher tells you he is teaching Japanesde material. You want the traditions to start with Choi and not go further back. You want the curriculums to include some material and not other material all because its convenient to you and not because there is historical provenance for any other option.
5.) And in the end, when you are not able to tolerate continual challenges to how you see things. Instead of asking yourself to broaden your view you ask me to stop asking questions. How wonderfully American, Stuart, not to have to change but to ask reality to change in deference to you. FWIW.
Best Wishes,
Bruce