Originally posted by MartialArtist
Hmmmmm...
The "classical mess" was to fight until one fighter is KOed or gave up.
Hmmmmmmm, you got it, but "WAS" is the keyward!:asian:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by MartialArtist
Hmmmmm...
The "classical mess" was to fight until one fighter is KOed or gave up.
Business and insurance. Lawyers, politicians, worried mothers. Spoiled kids and people who do what they want. Changing times, a new era.Originally posted by akja
Hmmmmmmm, you got it, but "WAS" is the keyward!:asian:
There's a general rule of thumb. Once you have PERFECT technique, and know the context of the technique as in (is this supposed to be used after I set it up a certain way or after a strike or what) and performing it X many times. I forgot the number, but I think it was 500-1500 that you have a general idea and have muscle memory and the technique burned into your CNS.Originally posted by fringe_dweller
That brings to mind a question that I've been wondering about recently. In hapkido we do a lot of joint locks and throws as well as strikes and kicks. If I was to spar I would use my strikes and kicks, but I'm more than a little worried about hurting someone - not because our techiques are so lethal, but rather because of my limited experience I wouldn't want to perform it wrong and do some serious damage.
So my question is, when do you introduce a techique into sparring? When you're 100% comfortable with it (as opposed to 100% competent which I'm sure is a whole other matter)?
Originally posted by D.Cobb
That Karate people like to get hit!
Why else would you fight with your hand on your hip?
--Dave
:rofl: