True enough. My point was we could argue that's not "MMA, the style" but an amalgamation of other styles (just as we could with Shojin-ryu). It's somewhat a matter of perception, and not terribly important, either way. If someone said what I teach is just an amalgamation of NGA and some other stuff rather than a separate style, I'd be okay with that - it's a reasonable description. Of course, we could also argue that "an amalgamation of NGA and some other stuff" is just the definition of what the style Shojin-ryu is. We could do the same with MMA.Yet if even one single gym in the world teaches it wholisticly, it's a style in that place, even by buddies own definition.
If it exists as a style in a place, it exists.