- Joined
- May 17, 2011
- Messages
- 2,419
- Reaction score
- 329
And complete is also a bit of a misnomer. It's a bit easier to talk about specialization (as in who is better at what). For example tkd may have punches but nowhere near the level of boxing. It may have elbows and knees but nowhere near Muay Thai. It may do some grappling but its clinch is not as specialized as muay Thai or wrestling, its takedowns as specialized as judo or wrestling, its ground game as specialized as judo or bjj.
Every art has their speciality and really if you actually want to learn to cover grapple you're better off going to a grappling art than half assing it in another art.
It all depends upon the focus of the art. You mentioned TKD vs. boxing for punching, vs. Muay Thai for elbows and knees and vs. wrestling for takedowns. If we're talking about TKD as a sport then we can compare it with boxing, muay thai and wrestling as they are all sports as well. Each of those sport arts are indeed specialized and therefore not complete in that they don't cover elements of other arts. If the focus of the art is on SD however, it is a very different ball game. One can train in TKD or Karate or Kong Soo Do or whatever label one chooses and have a very complete art that covers all the bases i.e. stand up, ground, weapons, throwing, locking etc. This doesn't mean that a student or even an instructor is going to become a ninja master in each and every area. We all gravitate towards segments of the arts that work best for us. I honestly could not tell you how many uses-of-force I've had over the years. I stopped counting at three hundred and that was a decade ago. In all that time I've never kicked anyone. Not even a low kick. I've knee spiked the crap out of people...literally. I've punched (soft body targets). I've used elbows, forearms and edge-of-hand strikes. And I've used locks and throws far more often than any of the above. Locking is my personal specialty. But the point is that the art, if taught in this manner, can offer a full venue for the practitioner to learn and then specialize within the art itself. I can teach realistic kicking for self-defense even if I don't use it myself. I know the technique(s), I know the SD types of kicks. I know the targets and targets of opportunity. I just don't kick people in a real fight. If the art isn't taught this way, then one would need to go outside the art to fill in the gaps that they perceive exist.
Kinda funny really, I could just as easily use the term TKD instead of KSD...yet I fight like I'm inside a phone booth