It's surely hard to put into words but easy enough to discern in person. To me a black belt has applicable skill in bare hands combat. He has certain elements of timing to see an opening along with the physical prowess to connect with a devastating blow to the same target. A black belt should have experienced exhaustion and pain and be able to fight through those feelings at least for a short time. You should be able to step onto the floor with a black belt for a friendly match and be see crisp technique, efficient movement, effective defense.
I can certainly agree with that.
don't think it's hard to recognize a black belt in person after seeing him move. It should be by definition an elite rank that few reach, keeping in mind that one can reach functional status in one's system before making black.
For the most part, I agree. I do not necessarily agree with the 'elite rank' definition though. There should be a single, challenging standard (one that Twin Fist would approve of, just to clarify what I mean by challenging). One either meets it or they do not. If 100 people come through the school who all work for and earn it, and meet the standard, then 100 BB's is fine. If only one of those hundred can meet the standard, then so be it. One BB.
, you are a supporter of the poom belt. I've never seen a poom/junior black who didn't think his black belt symbolized a certain effectiveness in fighting.
Yes, I support the poom rank, but not giving out black belts with it. I have stated many, many times that
poom rank students should be wearing poom belts and poom doboks (assuming that you are talking Kukkiwon taekwondo).
I realize you're big on the curriculum = rank tier concept. I even use it myself, listing certain techniques for each rank level in my school. That said, I will never promote anyone to even brown belt unless they 1) have useful power 2) are sufficiently aware and attuned to be able to take advantage of certain openings an opponent poses and 3) have a certain amount of spirit within them (I believe TKD people would say indomitable spirit).
It's not just about the belt charts to me.
I am not sure where you get the idea that I am "big" on the curriculum = rank concept. I feel that the equation should be reversed: Rank = curriculum, and rank is determined by
proficiency in the curriculum learned thus far. In fact, I have stated in many posts that I am big on proficiency.
Essentially, my school of thought is that when you are proficient in your white belt curriculum, then you can test for your first colored belt. When you are proficient in the curriculum for that level and more polished on that of the previous, then you may test for your next colored belt. If that process takes ten years, so be it. If a mondo dedicated uber martial arts wiz can do it three years, so be it.
Belts are only a marker of the student's progress. No chart is involved.
Daniel