Is Self-Defense Spiritual?

I do think humans have a spirit, and thus are spiritual beings at root. Saying someone said about life- "we are spiritual beings having a physical experience". In my own mind, this explains why humans are constantly attaching spiritual significance to everything. It's like as a whole we can't help but do it. Nothing is spiritual without human involvement.
 
Could you please specify what you meant by 'contradictions'? What do you mean by "trying too hard"? I am guessing you do Jow Ga, but do you have training in things like Buddhism or dao?
I do not. Everyone brings their own religion to Jow Ga. Jow Ga does not dictate a required spiritual thought or "way of being" People are what they are when they train Jow Ga, which is why teachers are mindful on who they teach. If Jow Ga had the ability to create good people, then we would not be concerned about instructing bad people.

You've said this a few times now so it seems you want to talk about it, but you didn't ask me anything about what I said to clarify so I was waiting to see if you would talk about the specifics.
I did not ask anything because experience naturally shapes people's beliefs and perceptions. We cannot separate the two because it becomes part of us. With that said. When we look at what people in the past are saying we should take into consideration what they may have been experiencing. What was going on during their time? Were they exposed to a lot of chaos and war? Did they fight in any battles? Did they train martial arts, did they use martial arts for fighting? Or did they just observe what they saw and what they believed they saw. Context is everything.

The mistake that most people tend to drift into is to not consider the context of what the author is saying. We (including me) tend to imprint an experience on the words of others that do not exist for the author of those words. For example, People who train to us Martial Arts techniques find peace in doing so.
  1. Sparring / competitive fighting relieves stress, it promotes good health and cardio, it promotes brain function in the area of analyzing body mechanics and reaction times. It allows the user to train strategy and consequences. It allows a user to overcome adversity and promotes positive self-esteem. Training martial arts applications creates positive social bonds, a warrior brotherhood so to speak, that is made of people who have been through "the elements of battles" It promotes self-realization of one's abilities and limitations in terms of their physical safety.
  2. Mentally Sparring /competitive fighting helps you mentally prepare with the fear, anxiety, stress, and uncertainty that comes with protecting yourself against physical and mental hardships. People who know how to fight often have a confidence that other's do not have. They have a sense of security and safety that other's may not half.
  3. Mentally people who train to fight often have a better appreciation of the pain encountered in fighting. They also tend to have better restraint of violence because it's what they have to do in training.
So when people talk about peace of martial arts and the spirituality of it, I think they are missing the context of what a person is referring to as "Peace" for those who fight and spar and train martial arts. The Peace isn't "be peaceful to others" the peace is "Being at Peace with oneself." It's an inner peace not an outwardly peace. Being at peace with oneself. People who are not at peace with oneself are often full on conflict and drama that benefits no one. Violence is a part of life that is neither good or bad. It's a tool and how one decides to use it is what matters.

A world without Violence is not peace. Because that world is not balanced.
 
Here's a definition of Peace
Peace is a state of tranquility, calm, and harmony, free from conflict, violence, or disturbance. It can be understood in various contexts:
  1. Personal Peace: Inner calm and mental serenity, free from stress, anxiety, and inner turmoil.
  2. Social Peace: Harmony and cooperation within a community or society, characterized by the absence of conflict and violence.
  3. Global Peace: The absence of war and conflict between nations, promoting international cooperation and understanding.
Peace is often associated with positive qualities such as compassion, understanding, and mutual respect.

The reality of this definition is that one cannot define Peace unless there is violence, stress, anxiety, inner turmoil or conflict. Simply remove those words from the definition and there is no longer any peace. Peace is what you get when you overcome these things. To make a goal to be non-violent as the ultimate goal is to fail to understand that non-violent is an approach and it's a psychological approach. Monsters will be Monsters. Predators will be predators. They will eat you even if you are non-violent and that's the purpose of being non-violent. It makes it easier to prove that who you are protesting against is the monster you say they are, because Monsters are Monsters and Predators are predators, and they will still eat you even if you are non-violent.
 
What will you do if someone says, "I'll kill you next time when I see you."

Depends

If one wants to kill or wants to die,
How this is done is a matter of perspective.

Who is the hunter? Who is the hunted?
The point in each of your examples is to get beyond this.
Both can say they avoided the other.

Each allowing the other to live, both not wanting to die.

As an Infantry Medic "late 70s"
Stenciled this on my track (M577 APC)

file picture of 577

ikcw4ch1ehm41.jpg


"trained to kill, born to die"

My sergeant, at the time laughed.
told me to, paint over it....in his usual colorful language..

after 10yrs in the medical corps, changed MOS's "jobs".
not having resolved this within myself... at the time.
 
Last edited:
What will you do if someone says, "I'll kill you next time when I see you."

I had this happen in my security days..... generally all I said was..."Get in line"
Got a lot of death threats back then....had one call me on the phone... and then stayed on the line waiting for a reponse..... I said, "Brave person threatening over a phone...also stupid, for giving me a chance to respond" Then I hung up
 
But I think these are contradictory statements.

Martial arts are steeped in spiritualism, throughout history. It's actually hard to find a martial art that doesn't have some sort of spiritual history...even wrestling can be found in the Old Testament, that's how Israel was named.

Gyokuto posted about the Fudo Myo statue. That's a god of war.

Heck, that's what Martial means. Maybe what we are calling spiritual is just nature, with a lot of human invention on top? We are very creative beings, it's not a stretch to think we could come up with a thousand ways to justify death.
Martial Arts and Spiritualism are still 2 different things.

Wrestling, along with various other sports, can take on a spiritual aspect for some participants. However, this spirituality is based on the individual's own beliefs and values that they bring to the sport. Wrestling itself does not impart any spiritual doctrine.

There is no spiritual doctrine called Wrestling.

I think this is important in the world of sports because it means people from different beliefs can participate and have the same experiences when doing so.
 
Old karate saying: If you break my skin, I break your muscle. You break my muscle, I break your bone. You break my bone, I break your organ. Quite the opposite of your quote, which is nice, but oftentimes a luxury we can't afford to take a chance on.

Is not preserving one's life in harmony with human nature? Also, if a violent attacker is out of harmony with society, is it not our duty to stop him and put society a bit more back in balance?

No. True violence is not dissuaded by talk. If you evade, it will pursue and eventually reach you. It must be defeated. Look at how Hitler easily took over most of Europe. They tried talk and then convinced themselves he would not come for them. Neither strategy worked.
You are coming at this from a Japanese art perspective.
 
In Chinese culture and religion, self-defense can be seen both as a low-tech endeavor (such as farming, fieldwork or bodyguard work) and also, especially in terms of cultivation culture and religion, as a means to bettering one's self and even to achieve enlightenment. Across Taoism and Buddism we find references to a culture of self-development based around a sort of fusion between yoga, qigong, philosophy, and martial arts.

I think the point should be made that as a sovereign spiritual entity (someone with a soul) it is important to be able to defend your self in the physical plane while still understanding that the other person is a sovereign spiritual entity in the same sense you are. Then, the removal of ego can be accomplished via the drive towards non-violent martial arts and the seeds of enlightenment will have been planted, leading towards the practitioner's karma being changed by a lifetime of practice.

Another aspect to the removal of violence from defense is the foundation of a society; a society aims to keep it's population safe. So when engaging in self-defense it is important to avoid cruelty and "excessive violence" whenever possible. The very definition of excessive becomes whatever society allows to seep through the cracks. If someone comes to attack you, this is already a violation of society. You are only allowed to defend yourself because you are able to point to society and say "You failed me;" in any other case your actions, in that they overstep society's right to protect you for you, are to be seen as excessive.

Tao Te Ching Chapter 36 seems to discuss a type of restraint from violence as in fact the pinnacle of kung fu; "It is better to maim than kill, it is better to break than to maim, it is better to strike than to break, it is better to push than to strike, it is better to throw out (push) than to strike, and the highest level is when the opponent does not feel the action of the push against him." Heavily paraphrased, of course.

So considering we get a free pass from the ancients and society allows it, does that mean it is truly acceptable for one on the spiritual path to learn self-defense? Is it possible to respond to true violence in a non-violent way?
In order to make a moral choice, one must have an actual option. If one does not know how to dance, saying ā€œI choose not to danceā€ is not an actual choice. Same with choosing not to fight. If one doesnt know how to defend oneself, one cannot make an actual choice between defending oneself or not. That moral choice is not available to most people, although most will imagine that it is. Four Virtues help govern this and guide
I don't know if it's so much government propaganda as it is typical philosophy: idealistic but so often unhelpful. Scholars writing things without any sort of experiential knowledge. There have been exceptions, such as Kano Jigoro, who really did try to improve others through their writing and philosophy.

Eastern philosophy is often simplistic, contradictory and hypocritical when it comes to martial arts, Western tends to be more exploratory.

Look at the Art of War. This is a book about how to destroy entire armies, without losing your own. Look at European generals like Napoleon. They talked a big game but in the end all met defeat, it was just a matter of time.

So all this talk of "no violence" really doesn't resonate with me. War is hell, humans are violent creatures, and hokey New Age peacenik martial arts are really, in my opinion, a modern contrivance. People of want to believe martial arts lead to peace, I think that is totally backwards.
Not peace, resolution of conflict.
 
Martial Arts and Spiritualism are still 2 different things.

Wrestling, along with various other sports, can take on a spiritual aspect for some participants. However, this spirituality is based on the individual's own beliefs and values that they bring to the sport. Wrestling itself does not impart any spiritual doctrine.

There is no spiritual doctrine called Wrestling.

I think this is important in the world of sports because it means people from different beliefs can participate and have the same experiences when doing so.
One can have good Gung fu doing dishes. It just means hard skillful work. If you have good gung fu in wrestling, that can be one persons path to spiritual enlightenment. Many paths to the same goal. Spirituality is what you make of it, ritual comes in every flavor.
 
Heck, that's what Martial means. Maybe what we are calling spiritual is just nature, with a lot of human invention on top? We are very creative beings, it's not a stretch to think we could come up with a thousand ways to justify death.
Exactly. But I think it's amazing that no matter where humans are from. Most of us aren't willing to die for someone or something less than we see ourselves. A God of War is a very high ego lol. Or maybe not it speaks to the level of violence being so great that it would only be something that God could stop on that day. My guess emotions not only burn up quickly but they probably cycle through various states and the only thing that would be stable would be the idea or belief in a God of War.

What works even better is if my enemy believes my God of War is stronger than whoever they look up to. It's probably why the first thing Conquerors would do is smash religion and spiritualism.
 
What works even better is if my enemy believes my God of War is stronger than whoever they look up to.

Or maybe a Society that understood
how to handle things in their time.


In China there was a saying

čƛē­ä¹ę— (zhÅ« miĆØ jiĒ” zĆŗ).
extermination of nine generations
Punishment would extend to the criminalā€™s entire extended family, including grandparents, parents, children, grandchildren, aunts, uncles, cousins, etc., up to nine familial relations.

Along with a little more up to-date

ā€œę–©č‰é™¤ę ¹ā€ (zhĒŽn cĒŽo chĆŗ gēn)
"cutting the grass and removing the roots."
Eliminate something completely, ensuring that no remnants are left behind to cause future problems.
 
Last edited:
Who is the hunter? Who is the hunted?
The point in each of your examples is to get beyond this.
Both can say they avoided the other.
One year, my teacher was the main judge in one Taiwan SC tournament. A guy sat on his judge seat and refused to move. During the conflict, my teacher threw him down. The guy tried to poke my teacher's eyes. My teacher bit his finger off. The guy said, "I'll come back to you for this." Since that day, My teacher always carried a stick and looked for that guy. Finally, my teacher found that guy and settled the business once for all.

It's better to be the hunter than to be the hunted. The spiritual of self-defense is to let your enemy to defend himself.
 
There is no spiritual doctrine called Wrestling.
And yet, a wrestler without spirit will lose every time.

To wrestle successfully you need to summon internal willpower, and isn't that what we mean by spirit?

Not a soul or ghost or anything supernatural, but a nature based instinct to overcome.
 
It's better to be the hunter than to be the hunted. The spiritual of self-defense is to let your enemy to defend himself.
This is why I don't see martial arts and spiritualism as separate.

We are talking about self defense. It's not always "kill or be killed" extreme but it can be. Nothing motivates the will the survive like the power of fear, and isn't that the whole point of spiritualism? Conquering fear.

Without spiritualism you could argue any martial art will never work for you. And we see that all the time. For everyone who has a strong spirit to train to defend in action there must be a thousand with no such animation to act when threatened. These people go to classes, through the motions, claim to be scholars of warrior arts without ever being in a real conflict.

I'm not big on quotations to make a point but there are a lot on this one issue. "To be or not to be, that is the question...Horatio". That's a bit of a mashup but I think Hamlet is a good study for this topic.
 
Last edited:
I can't remember who had said this MA spirit.

- If you attack me, I'll move back.
- If you attack me again, I'll still move back.
- If you attack me the 3rd time, I'll jump in and eat you alive.
I think we are on the same page.

Maybe what are really two different animals are spirit and religion. Martial arts are all about spirit, maybe to survive or die trying to save others. As opposed to all those religions through history that brought the violence, mostly through words and rhetoric.

Many people will say "I'm not religious but I'm spiritual". But a well trained martial artist, you're going to feel their spirit. The look in the eye, their heart, their energy.

"Eye of the tiger, Rock". That animal spirit inside every human, doesn't necessary need a religion, a God, or any sort of philosophy. It's innate and primeval just waiting to be tapped.
 
Last edited:

Latest Discussions

Back
Top