I really don't get this 'guy's' hang up with gloves here..
Wing chun is a different training methodology. Many people train wing chun with chi sau only, or chi sau and gor sau, doing very little or no full contact at all. I think this is a better option than gloved sparring if you wish to avoid hard contact but don't want to add anything to the wing chun training methodology from outside. Fighting with body punches and palms to face is another option with bare hands that is lower contact.
So you're saying that training (ie. drilling) using low-to-no contact
without gloved sparring will produce
better fighting skills than those that also add gloved pressure testing to their training/drilling?!? Lol, do you realize how utterly stupid that logic sounds? Only someone with very little actual fight training experience would say something like that.
Why are you so afraid of people using gloves anyway? I think you're making a huge deal out of something that is really no big deal in most functional MA's.
I'm curious, how much actual gloved sparring have you done in your WC training pror to going only-knuckle -on-skin? I'm not talking about 12-16oz boxing gloves, I'm talking about open finger/palm 8oz gloves, or even the 4oz MMA gloves?
I guess I am a wing chun purist. I prefer the wing chun approach and don't like to tamper with it. I think it is a training method with a certain amount of genius involved in its creation.
I agree that WC is quit genius in it's approach to fighting, but what exactly is 'the wing chun approach' and who said it disallows the usage of protective equipment during skill testing/sparring? Aren't you making a bigger deal out of this that it really is? I mean, we're only talking about suing some protection while sparring.. WTF!
And didn't say you use a mouth guard when you do all of your bare knuckle full-force-to-the-face sparring? I bet they didn't have those 200 years ago either, so looks like you're changing WC training methods also, Mr. Purist!!
I think it is an interesting question for those who advocate changing the wing chun training methodology to consider.
Who said anything about anyone advocating changing training methodologies? I'm curious how long exactly you actually trained under your sifu(s) to know all there is to know all there is to 'wing chun training methodologies' to come here and play expert and question what everyone else is doing?
If I recall, the last time you claimed to train under someone, they didn't even remember you. So could it be possible you just might not really understand things as well as you think?
We don't need to go as far back as Leung Jan though. Yip man and those he taught didn't sprar with gloves. Were they effective at fighting? Or are we better now?
Effectiveness then vs. now is impossible to determine, so no use going down that road. But being effective at fighting is really an individual thing. And not everyone that trained with Ip Man was necessarily a good fighter.
While we surely know that at least
some of Ip Man's students were out fighting with other styles, can we really verify that they were sparring while in class at all (gloves or not)? And say they were sparring, how do you know they didn't use gloves? Bruce was a student of that era, and he was a big proponent of using gloves in his training...