A bag doesn't hit back when I punch it and that hasn't stopped me from landing the same punches to someone's face.Sorry the 9 pounds of force is not true. Just a made up number.
A bag dosent hit back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A bag doesn't hit back when I punch it and that hasn't stopped me from landing the same punches to someone's face.Sorry the 9 pounds of force is not true. Just a made up number.
A bag dosent hit back.
Hmmm...you mean the same way traditional martial arts in the US disappeared when the UFC got started?Kung Fu’s Identity Crisis - Roads & Kingdoms
Why Kung Fu Masters Refuse to Teach | VICE Sports
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/world/asia/hong-kong-kung-fu.html?_r=0
The main reason this is happening is because people (rightfully) believe that spending ten years to learn how to kick or punch properly is nonsense. This is especially true when you have equal methods where you can learn how to fight far more quickly.
It does if you don't watch out for the back swing after you've hit it.A bag dosent hit back.
I don't know anything about this match, or who the participants were.I studied TCMA for awhile. I really enjoyed it. It helped me develop my athleticism: calisthenic strength, flexibility, speed, etc. I built up reflexes and "feel" by doing sticky hands. However, you can look to the famous '70s match where 5 top kung fu fighters traveled to Bangkok and fought bare knuckle against 5 Muay Thai fighters. Everyone single one got KO'd or TKO'd by the MT stylists in the first round. They just weren't as brutal as they thought they were.
Hmmm...you mean the same way traditional martial arts in the US disappeared when the UFC got started?
Oh my mistake, that never happened...
So I took a few minutes and read thru the attached article.Kung Fu’s Identity Crisis - Roads & Kingdoms
Why Kung Fu Masters Refuse to Teach | VICE Sports
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/23/world/asia/hong-kong-kung-fu.html?_r=0
The main reason this is happening is because people (rightfully) believe that spending ten years to learn how to kick or punch properly is nonsense. This is especially true when you have equal methods where you can learn how to fight far more quickly.
This is true even for today. I'm also sure that there were people who see a technique performed and then try to imitate the technique without understanding how the technique really works. I run across many videos of people teaching kung fu techniques on you tube, and instantly I can tell that the mechanics for the technique are wrong and that the person really doesn't understand what he's doing, yet in his mind he does. As a result these same people open a school thinking that they know kung fu.So it is entirely possible that these participants were based in performance wushu, and would not be surprising if they cannot fight.
Yup, and modern wushu is alive and well today, so there are all kinds of people involved in that, who cannot fight, and were never meant to.This is true even for today. I'm also sure that there were people who see a technique performed and then try to imitate the technique without understanding how the technique really works. I run across many videos of people teaching kung fu techniques on you tube, and instantly I can tell that the mechanics for the technique are wrong and that the person really doesn't understand what he's doing, yet in his mind he does. As a result these same people open a school thinking that they know kung fu.
In my mind this is what wushu is like. It's a visual imitation of something real. A fake gun may look real, feel real, but lack the small things that allow it to function.
Or, if you forget about the bottom ring and do an upward instep kick.It does if you don't watch out for the back swing after you've hit it.
Ouch!Or, if you forget about the bottom ring and do an upward instep kick.
statements of ignorance.Well no, since no one ever made the argument that TMAs have disappeared, and Kung Fu declining in China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong is actually occurring.
Seeing Bjj getting practiced in an ancient Kung Fu temple is quite telling.
That's what I should have said. Fortunately, there was nobody in that part of the dojo at the time.Ouch!
So I took a few minutes and read thru the attached article.
There is some truth in it, but there are also some very questionable conclusions being drawn because a lot of history is ignored.
The takeover by the communists brought in some very tough times in china. Oppression, paranoia as neighbors spied on and reported each other for unapproved activities, starvation, disappeared people, and a propaganda that focused on the elimination of old culture in favor of new. That propaganda was the basis for a lot of the atrocities during that era, and included the suppression and elimination of traditional martial arts, in favor of the performance-oriented and very deliberately not combat -effective Modern Wushu that was invented by the government.
So the government, for political and propaganda reasons, began to kill off traditional martial arts in china in the 1950s. That process began well before the modern popularity of MMA and the UFC. For decades now, it has been increasingly difficult to find quality traditional Chinese martial arts, in china. Modern performance wushu has become the norm, is actively supported by the government, and is even used in places like Shaolin Temple in a fraudulent deception portrayal of martial arts. Yes, the monks also do modern performance wushu, but they don't want you and I to know it.
As an aside, one of my Sifus visited shaolin in the 1980s, and demonstrated some traditional long fist material. A couple of very old monks commented to him in private, that they remembered when that stuff USED TO BE practiced at Shaolin.
So, the government has taken a very active role in dictating activity in china, including martial arts. In recent decades the government has woken up to what is going on in the world around them, and they know a money making opportunity when they see one. With the rise in popularity of MMA, they see an opportunity for money and prestige, so they jump right in. They are developing their own version of competition martial arts in a desire to compete and take a piece of that pie. It is State sponsored, and they go for it. Nothing about this is surprising. That is exactly what china does.
But without some understanding of the history before all of this, it is easy to make some very uneducated and erroneous conclusions. Traditional Chinese martial arts are not being abandoned in favor of MMA because of a perception that they are ineffective. The truth is, they were being eliminated at the direction of the government long before now, so the good stuff is already hard to find in china. And, the government wants people to do MMA and similar competition type stuff, because they want a place internationally, for national pride, so there is still a lot of propaganda around that.
Seriously Hanzou, you are uneducated about this stuff. I am offering you an opportunity to get some of that education. But you need to be open to receiving it, and you need to stop acting like an expert in things about which you are ignorant.
There is nothing wrong with ignorance, so long as you are open to being educated when the opportunity arises.
But refusing an education and choosing deliberate ignorance is stupidity on a whole other level.
Make your choice.
statements of ignorance.
TMA's have disappeared
The Shaolin Temple Tagou Wushu School has 35,000 Students
Very good read that discusses Kung Fu in ChinaSource: Some thoughts from Professor Ben Judkins of Kung Fu Tea - The Last Masters
"People are saying that "kung fu is dying"?" Answer
I thought you were asserting that MMA's growth and the incursion of WMA (like boxing) was responsible for much of the decline. Did I misunderstand you?I do believe that my argument was that Kung Fu is in decline. Nothing you said above contradicts that assertion.
Adaptation isn't a sign of a dying art. It's a sign of an art that can live. To be effective, an art should continue to grow after inception. Failure to do so is often based on a logical fallacy. I've forgotten the term for it, but it's an assumption that the progenitor was somehow a genius beyond the ken of those now practicing the art, so his approach must be the only right approach to the art. Nearly every art I know of has seen changes in my lifetime - adding techniques, dropping techniques, adopting suitable techniques from other arts where the principles applied fit within the framework, etc.Yeah, his answer is that Kung Fu is evolving. Essentially meaning that they are modernizing and in same cases being forced to integrate Bjj, boxing, western wrestling, and MMA.
For some that is a sign of Kung Fu dying in China and abroad.
Your assertion is that Chinese martial arts is junk, and that is why it is in decline, and it is being driven out by the popularity of MMA.I do believe that my argument was that Kung Fu is in decline. Nothing you said above contradicts that assertion.
Yeah, his answer is that Kung Fu is evolving. Essentially meaning that they are modernizing and in same cases being forced to integrate Bjj, boxing, western wrestling, and MMA.
For some that is a sign of Kung Fu dying in China and abroad.
A bag doesn't hit back when I punch it and that hasn't stopped me from landing the same punches to someone's face.
Once again your ignorance.Yes, they practice Bjj there, so that number isn't surprising.