And my thanks to your father and grandfather!
However, given that I never made a case for zero h2h in war, your statement really doesn't address my comments.
Nor does it make taekwondo or judo war arts or change the fact that the primary weapon of the soldier is the rifle.
H2h has been the last resort for centuries, as weapons of some kind have always been the first choice. The fact that some h2h still can happen does not change that. And what h2h soldiers learn is not taekwondo or judo. It is, I suspect primarily gross motor skill based and is designed to be usable while wearing the gear that a modern soldier wears.
Daniel
My father's intention was that I follow in his footsteps, and that's how I came to be studying Savate at age 5. Savate, at least at that time included quite a lot of knife work. I don't think it does anymore, as it too has been "watered down".
He knew that things often go south in combat, and you can't always rely on your weapon.
Someone pointed out that "watered down" really not a proper term for what has happened to these arts over the years. I believe "reduced" or "diminished" would be better. This is because the curriculum has been reduced,
in part due to the advent of Olympic sport competition.
If the main focus of the art becomes sport competition, then parts of the art that have no relevance in competition will inevitably reduced or diminished. Another reason for this reduction is that the general population is really less interested in the old curriculum. They would rather be learning jump spin kicks than spend hours working on proper body position and bone alignment necessary for a reverse punch. Martial Arts becoming a business has had at least as much effect on the reduction of the art as has sport in my opinion.
In General Choi's book "Taekwondo" he describes the purpose of the art as (in part) defending the weak. The other purposes he mentions (if memory serves) do not include competition of any type. The purposes of the art were to develop character, improve health, and defend the weak. It was therefore based on combat.
I think Olympic style TKD practitioners can be successful in a SD situation. This is mostly due to their superior physical conditioning, strength, speed, and sparring experience. However, the depth and range of the techniques they learn is less than that of a traditionally trained practitioner.
I think that is the point of this tread.
Not that Olympic style TKD is invalid in SD, because it isn't. I do believe though that the Olympic style is
less valid in SD than is the traditional style.
I met a fellow in Hawaii - perhaps 10 or 15 years ago - who had an advanced Dan rank in TKD and was a huge proponent of the WTF and the Olympic style. He did tell me of a situation wherein he was attacked by someone that wanted to steal his wallet. What he did to discourage this attacker and save himself was to throw repeated round house kicks at his attackers legs and mid section. He said that eventually his attacker got discouraged and went away.
Contrast that with one of my seniors (back in the 70's) who owned a music store... One day a guy kicked in the door to his office and lunged at him. (he had no idea why) My senior stood and threw one punch - hitting the attacker between the bottom of his nose and his upper lip (pressure point). He said his attacker went down and didn't move.
In both these situations TKD was used successfully to defend themselves.