You might want to re-examine your bias. I don’t sell TMA for a living. I don’t actually make a dime from teaching these days, and have never made more than a few dollars a month. It’s a hobby.You claimed my analogy wasn't an analogy. I thought maybe you didn't know what it meant as it patently was one thing compared to another. That what the word means.
And no, my analogy said exactly what I meant to say. I realize you don't agree, but as a guy that sells TMA for a living why would you?
Also, reducto ad absurdum isn't a logical fallacy , it's a way of breaking them down. But this isn't that.
And many in TMA would argue I’m not very T.