- Joined
- Aug 3, 2015
- Messages
- 14,757
- Reaction score
- 6,372
There's nothing wrong with that if BJJ has a better approach to help setting up your Aikido techniques. For example, There have been times when I've seen a similar technique from a different system and I see how they were able to set up that technique. Then I go back and I ask myself can I set up my Jow Ga technique the same way that karate set up their karate technique. And a lot of times the answer is yes, even through one technique is Karate and the other is Jow Ga. The technique is similar enough were both are able to exploit the same scenario. If this is what is going on then they can still stay true to Aikido.Well yeah, but they're piggy backing off of BJJ. I think if Aikidoka want their art to be viewed as more effective, it needs its advocates to let it stand on it's own merit.
At this point you aren't substituting techniques, instead are gaining a better understanding in which an Aikido technique can be used. This would stay true to Aikido. It's only when you start substituting techniques to replace an Aikido technique that you run the risk of watering down Aikido or changing it into something else. Both are acceptable outcomes, but it will be up to the Aikido practitioner to determine that. I'm on the outside so I can't say what percentage of adoption keeps the system Aikido and what percentage changes the system into something else.