What? I dont have a permission slip. Crap does this mean my paycheck wont be coming next friday?
Look at the degree posted on your wall (assuming you have one). It's a permission slip.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? I dont have a permission slip. Crap does this mean my paycheck wont be coming next friday?
So the principles of All men should be treated equal regardless of race color or creed is on par in your mind with I want my tuition to go down and I refuse to transfer to a community college or a cheaper school to get the same education?
"If it takes a bloodbath, let's get it over with. No more appeasement."
Ronald Reagan, May, 1969, when asked about demonstrations at Berkley, just hours before he ordered the National Guard to put the demonstration down, with an action that wounded 51 and killed 1.(And 111 cops injured as well)
Haa Only thing hanging on my walls are an Honorable Discharge from the United States Marine Corps pictures of my family, and a Cross with my Lord and Savior on it.Look at the degree posted on your wall (assuming you have one). It's a permission slip.
The corporation took the most.
But again, has nada to do with OCD.
(source)Katehi said students have a right to protest peacefully, but the university bans camping on campus because of safety and health concerns.
Occupy UC Davis protesters have ignored the camping ban. The encampment went back up Monday night, and campus officials said it included as many as 80 tents Wednesday.
(source)UCLA students gathered Monday night in Westwood to protest tuition increases and the recent pepper-spraying of students by police at UC Davis. Sixty students rebuilt the Occupy encampment after it was shut down last Friday by police in riot gear, who arrested 14 people that day.
The students want to show their solidarity with Occupy UC movements across the state. UCLA is one of four UC campuses to protest.
I agree with you they have the right to protest anyhting they want. They can protest the high price of pop tarts if they want. My comment was there grievance is no where near the same level of the civil rights movment and for you to keep posting pictures of the civil rights movment in my opinion lowers the struggles they went thru.Intersting that you omitted the part of my quote where I basically said that the police would be wrong to do that to the KKK.
In a free society such as ours, the content of speech does not negate it's stautes as free speech.
In a free society such as ours, the status of the assembled does not negate their right to free assembly.
In a free society such as ours, the downright absurdity of a grievance against the govenment does not negate the right to seek redress against that grievance from the government.
I agree again with that statement however your rights are no greater then mine and do not trump my rights. Your right to be you is no greater then my right to be freeew from you. When you start to disturb the peace of others and block others rights to free movement you are wrong and need to back off to one side or the other.More to the point: I have children just a little older than those college kids. Agree with them or not, I support their right to protest-whatever, right up to and including the imprisonment of aliens at Area 51. I'd say that they could have conducted themselves better-but the whole sitting there with arms linked thing is your basic "non-violent resistance 101," and goes all the way back to Gandhi.
And how would you do it. You play police officer. The order comes down to clear the side walk. You ask, then order, then make the threat of arrest to get kids to move and they refuse. What would you do? Walk away? say oh well never mind?The cops-the only so-called "professionals" on the scene could have done better as well, and supporting their actions, even to say "they really had no choice" misses the point I've been trying to make, which goes back to the beginning of this thread and what you've posted here.
I never said it was because they were smelly kids is why I agreed with the action of the police. I said they violated the LAW. If you disagree with the LAW take it up with the LAW MAKERS or the board of directors of the college. The officer did not make the LAW and merely swore to uphold the LAW. If the LAW is wrong file a suit and have it challenged in court and have the bad LAW overturned. Its the legal way things are done in this country. Thats why we have Checks and balances written into our Constitution.What those kids were protesting, and who they were in no way excuses the police, nor should it. You want to make a procedural case of it? Fine. You say the cops had no choice? Good. You say that's what the kids wanted and intended in the first place? You're almost certainly right.
You say it's okay because it's just a bunch of smelly spoiled college students who could use a bath and a job? Well, let's commence with the pogroms now, because I just don't have the patience anymore: I've got my food stockpiled,my guns are all clean and my ammo locker is currently full......as the Great Communicator said when faced with a similar situation as governor:
[/SIZE]
Haa Only thing hanging on my walls are an Honorable Discharge from the United States Marine Corps pictures of my family, and a Cross with my Lord and Savior on it.
No bankers, no bail outs, no brokers.
Just "college costs too much".
Bob, get real. You have plenty of paper, especially if you incorporated.
This has everything to do with OCD. If the students are protesting the cost of school, it's because of the government/bank partnership.
I love how it never enters into your mind that the police should join the protesters. The moment this happens, we'll reach a turning point in this nation. Until then, we'll march toward tyranny.
Not impressed by who? Me I could careless I have zero interest in impressing anyone. Them? They earned my respect the day they signed on the line and strapped on the bootsNot impressed. A person is judged by their actions, not by their symbols.
I know I made this suggestion - if not on MT, then elsewhere. They are, after all, part of the 99%. The fellas up here voluntarily took a two- and three-year pay freeze to avoid layoffs. Damned if they weren't cut anyway. I don't see the people responsible for making the poor decisions rolling downward causing the upheaval in these people's lives getting laid off or taking pay cuts - in fact, they are taking raises and getting promoted.
Am I *really* the only one who sees something wrong here?
I never said it was because they were smelly kids is why I agreed with the action of the police..
Your husband wrong. Point balnk. period.
Im not getting arrested for my right to sit my lazy butt on a side walk. If.
I dont think you can compare what Ghandi did with a bunch of spoiled rich kids going to a school that costs over 78K a year (per the schools own website)
The Police Officers are on the side of the rest of the millions of people trying to live their lives and not be bothered by these freeloading campers, crapping and pissing in the streets, blocking the streets while they try to go to work to make a living to support families. They are on the side of the small businesses trying to stay open yet the sidewalks in front of the shops are blocked by these so called protesters. The police are on the side of the other 1000's of kids going to UC Davis trying to get an education and live their lives. The police are on the side of my family that wants to go downtown here where we live and enjoy some ice cream by the water front on this unseasonably warm nov day and not be bothered by people cussing yelling playing loud drums begging for money and then screaming when you dont give them any (and we have a small group of only about 15 protesters).
What I dont do is sit on my butt and cry about what I dont have. What I dont do is demand Govt take from others that have to give to me since I dont. AND most importantly I VOTE. If you dont then you have no right to cry about anything.
Yes they are lazy kids sitting on their butts doing nothing I dont disagree with that but no where did I say thats why they got sprayed.
In My opinion they are P.O.S but thats not a crime and they can cry until the cows come home thats not why they were sprayed.
Yes they are lazy kids sitting on their butts doing nothing I dont disagree with that but no where did I say thats why they got sprayed. In My opinion they are P.O.S but thats not a crime and they can cry until the cows come home thats not why they were sprayed.
There you go again elder showing democrats beating up minoritites. I really can't see how anyone can honestly compare the OWS silly people to the civil rights movement. What a stretch.
well they are in school to learn yet they were not in class they were sitting on their well BUTTS. So not going to class = lazy sitting on butts = sitting on butts. Lazy kids sitting on butts its really simple actually.In the first place, how do you know they're lazy kids sitting on their butts doing nothing?
Wrong I said several times they were only sprayed for braking the law and it has nothing to do with them being smelly or lazy. You choose to see what u want thats not my problem thats yours.Secondly, making the statement does imply some sort of correlation-it really shouldn't matter if they're lazy or not, if the police actions were correct. To make the statement implies that it supports the police action.
so now you would have rather seen the cops using physical force and not OC spray? OC spray has very very small chance of causing injuries. Physical force well has much greater chance of causing injuries.Based on the interactions beforehand, I'd say the police pepper sprayed them because they wanted to. Based on what took place after the spraying, I'd have to say that the spraying made no difference-the cops could have broken up that feeble "human chain" at any time, with a minimum of pain compliance technique, and put the cuffs on those kids-who, as Bill Mattocks has pointed out, wanted to be arrested, and weren't going to physically resist the police beyond the passive resistance they were already displaying. There were enough cops there to do this physically without harming anyone, if they were properly trained.
So you have no idea what your talking about then. You have zero idea about crowd control methods, zero idea about police tactics, zero idea about that departments Use of force policy. So basiclly you have zero idea what your talking about yet insist they were wrongHell, I've never worked in law-enforcement, but I've trained lots of people-cops and otherwise-in getting a sitting person to comply-and that's what took place here. It isn't even like the pepper spray made them move or unlink their arms or anything.
It is stupid. The kids should have been in class learning. They cry about how much they pay to go to that school and then dont even go to class they camp out and sit on sidewalks.The whole thing is just stupid-and so is saying it was the right thing to do.