RIP: Andrew Breitbart dies of 'natural causes'

billcihak said:
I started my thread on Andrew Breitbart here on the study because it was the most appropriate place for who he was. He dealt with issues that belonged on the study, hence, that is where I put the thread on his passing.
Well don't expect mourning, when he and his ilk fill people's heads with nonsense like "the Nazis were left wing," and "Thanksgiving celebrates the failure of socialism and the triumph of free enterprise for the Pilgrims," and they turn around and post it here, and insist that it's the truth after repeatedly being shown facts that demonstrate that is not. I'll say it again, I'm not glad he's dead-I'M AWFULLY GLAD THAT HE WON'T BE TALKING ANYMORE, THOUGH! So, something interesting I was going to post yesterday, along with the announcement of the retirement Olympia Snowe, a moderate Republican senator, tired of the polarization and divisiveness that grip American politics. In 1995, the Hubble Space Telescope captured dramatic images of gas formations in the Eagle nebula, about 7,00 light years from Earth. One of them became known as "The Pillars of Creation," an awe-inspiring demonstration of star formation, of literal creation in the vastness of the universe. View attachment $skyimage_2195_409738.jpg More recently, scientist have patiently explained that the pillars ceased to exist around 6000 years ago-the shockwave from a supernova destroyed them. We can see their images from 7,000 years ago, and we can see the shockwave from 7,000 years ago, but what we can't see is the shockwave actually hitting them 6000 years ago, and we won't be able to for another 1000 years or so. Our human sense of time and generally self-indulgent perspective makes understanding the big picture hard for some of our generally ego-centric brains. We struggle with similarly myopic perception when it comes to viewing our own culture, our own government, our own sense of place and potential, even when dealing with something as theoretically tangible as civil discourse, or birth-control, or energy policy, or death. We can't see that the policies, priorities and strategies we rely on today-even those we may view as new-may have ceased to be effective and applicable years or decades ago. This is the point in my post where I flesh out my grand metaphor with some hard-hitting analyses of how we're stuck in unproductive, argumentative cyclic debates about taxation, budget management, and valuing stasis over progress. Where I convince you that, together, Republican and Democrat, Conservative and Liberal, need to join forces to combat the ills that face us: a lagging economy, a real energy crisis, and a variety of social issues to long to get into here, but I can't. People like Andrew Breitbart are the reason I can't, as they fill people's heads with virulent idiocy like it's some sort of contagious disease. As for "not speaking ill of the dead," well, my perspective is obviously a little different. I spent the better part of my childhood expecting to die-being told by my parents and my doctors that I would not live to 9, then 11, then 15- simply not expect to live more years than I had already-really, in the end, what I learned was to not expect one more minute, and that's not a bad way to live at all. I have lived 51 years, nearly 52, and can truly say that I won't likely live as many more years as I already have.In that time, though,I killed countless rabbits, squirrels, and fish, around 30 deer, five elk, two bison, and countless chickens, rabbits, turkeys, goats and pigs that I raised myself. My grandparents all died, I watched my father wither away from cancer, I floated helplessly downstream watching my wife drown, I prayed at my sister's bedside as she died, and went home to tell my nephews they were coming to live with me. I watched a young man-a boy, really-bleed to death from where I stabbed him with my pen. People have died from diseases, murders, and disasters, both natural and man-made. People die every day, even stars die, though we may not live to see it.All of those people have loved ones, but those who receive renown are known afterwards for their acts. If, by virtue of what they put out into the world, I could say on Tuesday that they were an *** and exemplified all that was wrong with political discourse in this day and age, and that I wished they'd just shut up, I see no reason whatsoever not to say on this Friday, that they were an *** and exemplified all that was wrong with political discourse in this day and age, and that I'm glad that they've been shut up, simply because they've stopped breathing. Now, yesterday was, as I suspected it would be, a good day:I got two hours in at the gym at lunch time, had some good training , cooked a wonderful dinner for Rita-that's the wife-and raised a glass to Andrew Breitbart, which is about the most I could offer. I included his wife and kids in my prayers-they'll surely miss him, but I don't know their names. Fact is, when just about anyone dies, they leave behind loved ones to mourn them, and a legacy of acts by which the rest of us knew them. He was undoubtedly talented, and driven, but what he did with that talent and drive was sickening, and often dishonest-and contributed nothing of value to the direction our country is taking.
 
Last edited:
Brian King said:
Yup, which is a good thing. The other threads were I think in the memorial section, but didn't matter to the cheering folks. There is no longer a thread in the memorial section. Pity the reflection that has on our community but it is not unexpected.

No, Brian, they were all in the Study. Bill Mattocks started one, billi started one, and I started one, all at about the same time.
 
No problem. Andrew Breitbart was a good guy who fought the good fight for this country. He took on institutions that were previously considered off limits, ACORN, NPR, S.E.I.U., mains stream journalism and hollywood. I enjoyed his work, and hope that his guys and gals will keep the Big sites going.

Here is a piece from Bigpeace, the site Breitbart created to defend the military from the bias found in the mainstream media, academia and hollywood...

http://bigpeace.com/jhanson/2012/03/02/andrew-breitbart-a-brother-in-arms/

He was a huge supporter of the military, and when it was time for his “Big” empire to tackle national security, Big Peace was born. I had the privilege of assisting in building this blog up, and when the message from him arrived I was thrilled to get the nod. He was every bit as passionate as he seemed in his public persona, but he was truly kind and generous, too. That may sound like an anomaly, but you hear it from everyone who knew him. He was a hater, let there be no doubt, but not in the way the left uses that as an insult. He hated, with righteous indignation, all the hypocrisy and, well, the hatred that came from the left. They project their own racism and bigotry and intolerance onto the right, and he refused to stand for it.

So he fought as the happiest of warriors, gamely poking the smug bastards and bastardettes who masqueraded as our moral and intellectual betters right in their humorless cakeholes. He baited them in and then knocked them down. They railed at him and showed the world their asses, and he loved every minute of it. I only wish there had been more of those glorious minutes.

 
Last edited:
It's ironic, as well, that the man engaged in a three hour long twitter rant diatribe vilifying Ted Kennedy, in the hours after his death.




billcihak said:

No, billi, I'm betting he went to other place, and Ted Kennedy was waiting for him......:lol:
 
It's ironic, as well, that the man engaged in a three hour long twitter rant diatribe vilifying Ted Kennedy, in the hours after his death.

Great point. But is ironic the right word? Or is it hypocritical for many of the people that blasted Breitbart for his twitter ran to engage in the exact same behavior?
 
crushing said:
Great point. But is ironic the right word? Or is it hypocritical for many of the people that blasted Breitbart for his twitter ran to engage in the exact same behavior?

I wasn't one of those-in fact, I don't know anyone who blasted him for twittering and then engaged in the same behavior.

I'm also sure Breitbart didn't say anything about him after he died that he didn't say before he died.

So, yes, for me it's ironic, and not hypocritical at all.

For me, hypocrisy would be saying, Oh, how sad, and only 43 or some such, when I clearly do not feel that way at all.
 
CanuckMA said:
He will not be missed.

And I take exception to this. He will surely be missed...............................
................but not by you or me! :lol:
 
Actor Robert Davi on Andrew Breitbart...

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/rdavi/2012/03/02/do-not-go-gentle-into-that-good-night-andrew/

In 2004, when it was brought to San Diego, there was a dedication for the USS Ronald Reagan — how appropriate that on the deck of that magnificent carrier is where Andrew and I first met and became fast friends. He came up to me and was thrilled that I was there — thrilled and grateful that I was an outspoken conservative in Hollywood — and understood the difficulty I faced. As he said to many, he appreciated the courage it took to go against the tide of the liberal establishment. I will always remember it was the first time I felt someone, beside David Horowitz, understood the cost it took to express one’s values openly for fear of a modern day blacklisting. Yes, it does exist in this town.

And from Biggovernment contributor Frand Salvato

http://biggovernment.com/fsalvato/2012/03/02/breitbart-a-true-son-of-liberty/
 
Last edited:
I'm throwing my hat in the conspiracy ring because it's entertaining.

So ....
aliens.jpg
 
Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone had this to say about Andrew Breitbart :

[h=1]Andrew Breitbart: Death of a Douche[/h]
So Andrew Breitbart is dead. Here’s what I have to say to that, and I’m sure Breitbart himself would have respected this reaction: Good! **** him. I couldn’t be happier that he’s dead.

ut he also had enough of a sense of humor to appreciate why someone like me shouldn’t bother to pretend I’m sad he’s dead. He wouldn’t, in my place. So to use one of his favorite words: Good riddance, **********.* Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.



 
About Andrew Breitbart by a Bigjournalism contributor Lawrence Myers...

http://bigjournalism.com/lmeyers/2012/03/02/what-andrew-taught-me/
Andrew was also a living example of something my high school math teacher exemplified. Edwin Barlow – whose face I use as my avatar – announced in one class that “to be wholly devoted to some intellectual exercise is to have succeeded in life.” Mr. Barlow extrapolated this thought to one’s profession, describing it as akin to Immanuel Kant’s “categorical imperative.” Andrew’s categorical imperative consumed him, as it should. He pursued it relentlessly, with love and devotion, and was totally and unequivocally committed to it. He was, and shall remain, a constant reminder that I must do the same in any endeavor.

Finally, Andrew showed me the value of taking the fight to the other side. He called out the fakers, the phonies, the elitists, the narcissists, the apologists, the radicals, they hypocrites, the intellectually and journalistically dishonest, and he did it all without apology. I have always been drawn to people who literally say “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.” They remind me that we are all required to stand up for what we believe in, and sitting in the shadows only lets the other side further pursue their misguided goals unchallenged.
 
Shirley Sherrodd's lawsuit against Breitbart likely to continue.

A defamation lawsuit a former Agriculture Department employee filed against conservative journalist Andrew Breitbart is likely to continue despite Breitbart's unexpected death on Wednesday night at age 43.
USDA rural development staffer Shirley Sherrod filed the lawsuit against Breitbart and Breitbart aide Larry O'Connor last February over the pair's role in publicizing a video of a Sherrod speech which appeared to suggest the African-American Agriculture Department official was biased against white people. The publicity led to Sherrod's forced resignation, apparently with the White House's approval.
While the clips and analysis posted at Breitbart's BigGovernment.com seemed to indicate that Sherrod was racist, the full video of of Sherrod's speech included her indicating she had learned a lesson from her earlier predispositions and had come to reject racial stereotyping.
 
And the truth is that Sherrrod wasn't defamed and that the entire portion of the video was shown. What did it show, that the audience that Sherrod shared her story with whole heartedly approved of her initial act of racism. The fact that she later said she changed her mind and did help the white farmer wasn't what excited the crowd, but her initial act of racism. That is what Breitbart was exposing in the video, that is the truth of the video, watch it for yourselves and see the crowds reaction. The lies told about republican racism was exposed in that video which is why the left went nuts trying to lie about what was shown on the video.

And you might want to look up Shirley Sherrod and her connection to the Pigford scandal...interesting reading that Breitbart's sites exposed, and was ignored by the liberal media...

And from Frank Salvato, Biggovernment contributor...
I could chronicle the many stories that Mr. Breitbart’s publications have broken – the corruption of ACORN, the sexploits of Anthony Weiner and the many quasi-criminal actions of labor union operatives, among them. But it is more important – and more appropriate – to expound on why people like Mr. Breitbart are moved to do what they do; are moved to do what he did so well.
Put succinctly, Mr. Brietbart – as well as the rest of us who toil in the ideological trenches – despised bullies, cheats, liars and disingenuous opportunists. And instead of doing what an overwhelming number of Americans do, sadly – complain about it and little else, he decided to put his money, his reputation and, to a great extent, his life on the line to do something about it. He decided to stand-up. He chose to act.

Andrew Breitbart, a leader among the few real and honest new media outlets published today, decided to “take the heat” as he pointed fingers at the disingenuous, opportunistic politicians who prey on the emotions of voters; political charlatans who manipulated the uninformed out of their votes. He decided to brave the far-reaching and potent castigation of very powerful political entities, i.e. the Soros-Progressive Left political smear machine and the many off-shoots gaming the public; presenting as “community organizers” and the champions of the “less than fortunate. He dedicated himself to the pursuit of the truth; in an effort to shine a spotlight on the cretinous among us who exploit the vulnerable just to advance an ideological agenda. And Mr. Breitbart was courageous enough to call his own brethren out when they transgressed ethical boundaries or caved to the allure of opportunism and/or narcissism.
In doing all of these things; in being brave enough to endure the slings and arrows of the mainstream media, the powerful politicos and the shadowy figures who support them – both financially and sometimes with “muscle,” he became someone less than revered by the powerful and someone respected and admired; someone trusted, by the rank-and-file.
Many of us have been doing this advocacy – advocacy for Americanism, for honesty and truth, for liberty and freedom – perhaps as long or longer than Mr, Breitbart did publicly; no doubt his passion was burned into his soul from his very genesis.
 
Here is Andrew Breitbart, himself, explaining that the video tape was used to show the racism in the NAACP as they show their approval of Shirley Sherrod as she initially explains how she treated a white farmer badly when he came to her for help. That was the point of the vide, and of course, to protect the NAACP and to deflect the obvious racism at the event, the liberal press made it about Shirley Sherrod.

Breitbart begins his explanation at the 56 second mark as the host tries to focus the story on Sherrod, and away from the racism of the NAACP shown in the video...

At the 3:39 mark Breitbart explicitly states the video was not about Sherrod but about the NAACP and this is why breitbart was attacked and accused of going after Sherrod, to hide the fact that the response by the crowd was racist.

at the 4 minute mark he again explains the point of the video, as the host tries to once again deflect what was actually shown on the video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU2igzWD5Ms&feature=related
 
Hmmm...Breitbart was planning on releasing Obama's college videos on March 1st. I'm not calling on conspiracy silliness, but I am waiting for his guys to release these videos. It was hinted that it might show obama with his old freinds, unrepentent, domestic terrorist bombers bill ayers and his wife bernadine dohrn during his college days. We may have to wait till next week for the release of the videos...
 
Back
Top