now disabled
Master Black Belt
Am I right in saying that the DNBK was purged ?
As were other more "secret" groups
As were other more "secret" groups
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think I know what you mean
Are you talking about the Imperial Rescript on Education ?
no. i was talking about a document by the US Governement.
Imperial Rescript on Education - Wikipedia
The Imperial Rescript on Education (教育に関する勅語 Kyōiku ni Kansuru Chokugo) was signed by Emperor Meiji of Japan on 30 October 1890 to articulate government policy on the guiding principles of education on the Empire of Japan. The 315 character document was read aloud at all important school events, and students were required to study and memorize the text.
The Rescript requested of the people that they "furthermore advance public good and promote common interests; always respect the Constitution and observe the laws; should emergency arise, offer yourselves courageously to the State; and thus guard and maintain the prosperity of Our Imperial Throne coeval with heaven and earth".
The basis of the Rescript was that Japan's unique kokutai (system of government) was based on a historic bond between benevolent rulers and loyal subjects, and that the fundamental purpose of education was to cultivate virtues, especially loyalty and filial piety.
After the end of World War II in Asia following the surrender of Japan, the American occupation authorities forbade the formal reading of the Imperial Rescript in schools, and the National Diet officially abolished it on 19 June 1948.
I guess when I mentioned the occupation etc I opened a door of huge dimensions (and rightly so it is a huge and vast ranging topic and of many diverse influences) what I was getting at and I was probably unclear on was like when the Tokugawa established their Shogunate and the Ryu adapted and changed and evolved due to that influence ... Did the occupation (I believe it did) again influence the change of the schools? How they taught, To whom they taught and what they actually taught?
One thing I have noticed (and purely my own opinion) is that the Japanese may not actually create a "thing" themselves but they are very good at adapting a thing making it their own and then exporting it for gain. There by ...they did not invent the arts but (due to the Pacific War and subsequent occupation) they did export them and fairly successfully, The question is to me what did they export and now due to the world being so globally connected a people researching more and more and again because of the technology to share said are we not getting very hung up on what is tradition and what is not?, where it came from and why? and is it that in the 21st cent we are guilty of trying to grab the past for justification etc and are we not really guilty of looking back through tinted glasses and taking things out of context?
If Elon Musk could build us robotic sparing partners this would help.
I have a question about the OP.
3. "Traditional" arts often hold back information. They are somewhat secretive and unwilling to share or talk about what they consider important elements of their system. Among their own students they may teach the "secrets" or the "good parts" to only a select few that demonstrate loyalty over many years. Or they may string out their curriculum over a long period of time simply to keep students coming and paying the tuition
Is this actually a thing? I've never actually encountered this.
Interesting, I was going to start a thread about this.
Am I right in saying that the DNBK was purged ?
As were other more "secret" groups
shuuuuuuush...If it is a secret. How would you know?
I guess when I mentioned the occupation etc I opened a door of huge dimensions (and rightly so it is a huge and vast ranging topic and of many diverse influences) what I was getting at and I was probably unclear on was like when the Tokugawa established their Shogunate and the Ryu adapted and changed and evolved due to that influence ... Did the occupation (I believe it did) again influence the change of the schools? How they taught, To whom they taught and what they actually taught?
One thing I have noticed (and purely my own opinion) is that the Japanese may not actually create a "thing" themselves but they are very good at adapting a thing making it their own and then exporting it for gain. There by ...they did not invent the arts but (due to the Pacific War and subsequent occupation) they did export them and fairly successfully, The question is to me what did they export and now due to the world being so globally connected a people researching more and more and again because of the technology to share said are we not getting very hung up on what is tradition and what is not?, where it came from and why? and is it that in the 21st cent we are guilty of trying to grab the past for justification etc and are we not really guilty of looking back through tinted glasses and taking things out of context?
no. i was talking about a document by the US Governement.
Imperial Rescript on Education - Wikipedia
The Imperial Rescript on Education (教育に関する勅語 Kyōiku ni Kansuru Chokugo) was signed by Emperor Meiji of Japan on 30 October 1890 to articulate government policy on the guiding principles of education on the Empire of Japan. The 315 character document was read aloud at all important school events, and students were required to study and memorize the text.
The Rescript requested of the people that they "furthermore advance public good and promote common interests; always respect the Constitution and observe the laws; should emergency arise, offer yourselves courageously to the State; and thus guard and maintain the prosperity of Our Imperial Throne coeval with heaven and earth".
The basis of the Rescript was that Japan's unique kokutai (system of government) was based on a historic bond between benevolent rulers and loyal subjects, and that the fundamental purpose of education was to cultivate virtues, especially loyalty and filial piety.
After the end of World War II in Asia following the surrender of Japan, the American occupation authorities forbade the formal reading of the Imperial Rescript in schools, and the National Diet officially abolished it on 19 June 1948.
good questions. a lot to try to unpack there.
i think something that is generally over looked and something i try to always point out is that there has to be a distinction between Okinawan martial arts.. (i refer to this as Tode) and the martial arts that were brought and further developed on main land Japan starting with Funakoshi ( i call karate)
they are not really the same if we use todays common divisions and to lump them together as just karate causes more problems and incorrect assumptions. it would be like describing humans, neanderthal and cro magnon as all just people.
the biggest effect on karate was the transfer from Okinawan to Japan by Funakoshi. that being only one source rather than multiple, creates a single dimentional result. second is the re appropriation of karate for the war by the Japanese Governement. then the back lash into pacifisim by the Japanese people along with the sport aspect that we already mentioned. THEN all this is brought back to Okinawa from Japan. the third factor is the American influx into the Okinawan dojo. things were codified, dumbed down and passed on to American service men who brought it back to America starting a kind of feed back loop between the two countries.
JCS: Documentation Regarding the Budo Ban
"With the end of the war in August 1945, the Ministry of Education regained control of Japan’s physical education curriculum, and this ended the bayonet and grenade throwing in the Japanese public schools. Simultaneously, judo, kendo, kyudo, and karate teachers began returning their instruction to prewar standards. Consequently, most martial art practitioners expected that it wouldn’t be long before tournaments and promotions resumed, similar to what they had been before the war.
Then, on October 22, 1945, the Supreme Commander Allied Powers (SCAP) notified the Ministry of Education that "dissemination of militaristic and ultranationalistic ideology will be prohibited and all military education and drill will be discontinued." Two months later, on January 4, 1946, SCAP issued Directive 550, which, with its companion Directive 548, required "the removal and exclusion from public life of militaristic and ultra nationalistic persons." One result of these orders was that the Ministry of Education eliminated martial arts from school curricula and another was that the Dai Nippon Butokukai was closed.
Although new federations quickly arose to take the place of the Butokukai, its closure still left Japan without a central regulatory authority for martial arts for the first time in decades. Meanwhile, from 1946 until 1948, SCAP actively persecuted ("purged") former fascists. Some of the latter were martial art enthusiasts. This added to the confusion about what was legal and what was not, and the result was confusion in Japanese martial art circles that did not begin working itself out until the late 1940s.
Because of this postwar confusion, there has since arisen the perception that SCAP imposed a Budo Ban on Japan. In reality, however, the "budo" banned was not traditional martial arts such as kendo and judo, but instead the products of state fascism that operated under the same name during the 1930s and 1940s.."
I have a question about the OP.
3. "Traditional" arts often hold back information. They are somewhat secretive and unwilling to share or talk about what they consider important elements of their system. Among their own students they may teach the "secrets" or the "good parts" to only a select few that demonstrate loyalty over many years. Or they may string out their curriculum over a long period of time simply to keep students coming and paying the tuition
Is this actually a thing? I've never actually encountered this.
The first rule of Secret Club...shuuuuuuush...
you arnt allowed to let people know that even the secrets exist.
Sometime secret is kept between different MA styles.The first rule of Secret Club...