Originally posted by akja
Yiliquan1,
Your training starts with less than one year of training actuall only 8 months. Then you practiced on your own for 3 years.
Actually, going back over things, I started training in 1985. Sorry about that!
Remember we are counting your actual class time. Everbody discounted my training that wasn't in an actual clas under an instructor. Evertime I was trying to explain what I did on my own all I heard was I never completed any of the arts. It was like everybody had earmuffs.
I think the issue with your training on your own was that eventually it led to being certified in an art you didn't study. At least that was what I got out of it...
OK back to your training, so far you've got 8 months of class time under an instructor. So now from 1990-91, you received a year plus or minus of training from your insructor and toy were promoted to a level just 2 levels below black belt and permitted to teach a small class. So your nearing a black belt level and you only have 2 years of class time in.
Well, with the revised start date, I am looking at 3 years or so of training and only just reaching a low brown belt level.
You spent the next 7 years teaching although you didn't reach a black belt level and you only received 2 years of instruction. Then all of the suuden you get tested and promoted to a black belt level by your senior, in your system, not your actual instructor, but the same system.
I didn't teach full time over those seven years. I taught at the hospital for about 3 months or so, the TKD school was about 4 or 5 months, and Dojo Omaha was only a couple of months as well. The class at Fort Riley was 2 years in duration before I was promoted to black...
I did train under Tim and another of our instructors periodically, going to them for corrections, additional techniques and forms, etc. They supervised my solo training, though I did not actually train under their direct guidance. Just clarifying, not defending against what you are saying - so far you have been pretty much on the money.
Don't take this wrong. But you were only taught for 2 years max and you got promoted to a black belt level. What is the differance between your 2 year black belt and the ones that some people get after 2 years of training? I just said it.
The difference? Perhaps from one perspective not much. On the other hand, however, there were 3 years of instruction, and 9 years of practice... That could make a difference, I think.
You were evaluated on your merit, period. Whether you trained for 20 years on your own or whatever, you still were only taught inyour art for 2 years max.
No, not merit at all. We have very firmly defined and documented requirements for advancement. The test for Senior Level 1 alone is three pages long, and is a relatively easy test (compared to how they get afterwards!). I took the test and was evaluated on whether I knew the information and whether I performed to the standards required. If I didn't qualify for advancement, I would have been failed.
So how could you have learned the rest of the system?
I haven't! That is the thing of it (at least with Yili...). Just because I have reached Senior grade, doesn't mean I have accomplished anything at all... There is
so much in front of me, I feel like I haven't learned anything at all!
You were evaluated on your accomlishments! I know you think that you practiced one art all that time but you aren't psycic, you could not of taught yourself something that you do not know!
I didn't "teach myself" anything. I practiced the information I had, went to my seniors to learn things I hadn't learned up to that point, and continued to practice. The only "new" things I learned were insights into the "old" techniques I had been practicing...
This is the exact scrutiny that I received. But the differance between you and me. You were taught in class instruction only 2 years and received the equivalent of a 1st Dan. I had around 15 years of actual class time and was promoted to 5th Dan!
Well, I agree and disagree... If I remember correctly, your grade was given you by someone under whom you hadn't really studied, in an art similar to the one you studied, but not the one you studied... Am I correct?
You see in between my 15 years of actual class time time I spent some time off, no doubt but I've spent much time teaching and training. My time in the arts spans over the last 30 years and my time teaching and training on my own adds up!
I said early on that I had no first hand knowledge of what your technique was like, and I remember saying that it may well be of high quality - bottom line, until I see it in person I won't know. I have no problem with someone learning a great deal during their own practice... Sensei Sherm Harrill (may he rest in peace) trained directly under Shimabuku in Okinawa for only a few years. Shimabuku told him "go and train for 25 years.
Then teach." He did, and he was awesome. No problem with that. But he was trained in, and graded in, Isshin-ryu. Not Goju or Shuri, but Isshin-ryu. I was trained in, and graded in, Yili. Nothing else.
Nice post and nice examination of my training time. Very objective.
Gambarimasu.
:asian: