Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
new people will not know good from bad. maybe not at first. but given a short amount of time and exposure they will know. there is nothing wrong with signing up at a mcdojo. the people who want more will move on ...AND the people who like it stay for what ever their reasons are, they stay. DO NOT ASSUME THEY DONT ANY KNOW BETTER. they do.
As for the "it's all karate to the layman" - I think that's at least 20 years out of date for the majority, and even fewer who go as far as to enquire are that uninformed.
Half of my Taekwondo students come in and tell me they're excited because it's karate class today.
It's like if was to go "Xerox something" on a Ricoh copier.
Most of the time. Generally people can figure out if what they're getting will "turn them into an unstoppable fighting machine" (a phrase I heard on here a while back), or if it won't. And they may continue anyway because they like the atmosphere, it gets them in shape, they enjoy it, etc. and don't care about fighting. BUT some people actually do believe what their learning will work, and that is why they're doing it, even if that's not the case. I wouldn't assume that, since my assumption is that is in the minority, but it does happen.
In the Hapkido I studied in Korea, one was supposed to be a 3rd Dan to teach in a school under the owner/master. One was supposed to be a 4th Dan to have one's own school. Everyone knew that rank in Hapkido was earned. So having those ranks meant you could do those things. Certification? Never heard of it. I also never met a bad teacher. I think that one may be a western creation, and it may have come from legal seminars.
It also wasn't done in the 60s to my knowledge. I never heard anyone question Mr. Rhee's qualifications to teach. You only had to see a few moves of his and you were convinced. He had the demeanor to teach effectively as well.
I guess those things don't count so much these days.
Your 3rd Dan is the certification, or 4th Dan.
We actually get a certificate at my school for each art we test in. I have certificates stating I am 4th Keub in Hapkido (orange belt) and 2nd Degree in Taekwondo (really 2nd Dan, 3rd Gup, but I'm pretty sure that the Dan rank is all another school will care about).
So if you have anything proving you are a 3rd degree, that is your certification in the art.
Although what I mean specifically about certifications for various locations is something like a school might require a certificate to prove you have the credentials you say you have if you want to open up a Hapkido class as an elective at the school.
That is something that is very true ...we all can differentiate but to the layman Karate is the one all know as it was probably the first one to be promoted and advertised in the "west"
I said before that it would be interesting in getting and advertising pros opinion on this as it may differ from what those who are already students of the arts
Your arguments are pretty broad. In the states at least, a medical doctor requires a bachelors degree, a minimum 3 years post graduate, and a minimum 2-3 years residency. So the certification is implied and competency hopefully secured through the process. If I go to McDonalds I do not give thought to the cook, the very name is a stretch there. If I go to a five star restaurant, I very much want to know about the chef.This is all a artificial problem. The only reason people care about ranks is that they have been told to care about ranks. Would you have the same sorts of issues in a dance school? A Yoga studio? A crossfire gym? Do you know your doctors educational history and GPA? How about your lawyers? When you go to a restaurant do you first ask where the chef studied culinary arts and to what level?
If you are advertising based on your credentials you are missing the mark completely. Advertising is about the person doing you are advertising too, not the person doing the advertising. People will care about what you can do for them more then how many stripes you have on your belt.
In the Hapkido I studied in Korea, one was supposed to be a 3rd Dan to teach in a school under the owner/master. One was supposed to be a 4th Dan to have one's own school. Everyone knew that rank in Hapkido was earned. So having those ranks meant you could do those things. Certification? Never heard of it. I also never met a bad teacher. I think that one may be a western creation, and it may have come from legal seminars.
It also wasn't done in the 60s to my knowledge. I never heard anyone question Mr. Rhee's qualifications to teach. You only had to see a few moves of his and you were convinced. He had the demeanor to teach effectively as well.
I guess those things don't count so much these days.
Somebody correct me if I am wrong. I have never heard of an ITF school affiliated with the Kukkiwon.In Korea you need a 4th dan to open a Taekwondo school, almost exclusively through Kukkiwon. I know there are a few ITF dojang, but those guys may have Kukkiwon certificates, as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Somebody correct me if I am wrong. I have never heard of an ITF school affiliated with the Kukkiwon.
Somebody correct me if I am wrong. I have never heard of an ITF school affiliated with the Kukkiwon.