- Thread Starter
- #61
And yet, here you are at Martial Talk.I dropped out at yellow belt as a kid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet, here you are at Martial Talk.I dropped out at yellow belt as a kid.
Nope, you see this so called circular discussion that you say that Im having has nothing to do with me making shodan at the Goju Ryu dojo Im going to right now. Rather it's about the rank of black belt in general and how it's viewed which includes whether or not it's acceptable for students to ask about it.I really really really really really really really hope you pass the test and earn your shodan. Then we can stop having this circular discussion over and over and over and over.
And then you'll be met with a passive-aggressive response, such as "You can have this belt for $10." My point was to find ways around that.You could ask the instructor how long it takes on average to earn a black belt at the dojo.
The point was that Mr. Miyagi gave an infantilizing response that didn't answer Danny's question, which is also what Unel did. Again, anyone who has watched the movie should know better.I don't recall the movie saying it was taboo to inquire about black belts, the movie just makes the point that the martial arts is in the head and the heart, not in the belt as Mr. Miyagi explains to Daniel. The fictional character of Mr. Miyagi doesn't really believe in rank in the martial arts and the only time he uses rank is if you're entering a tournament where you have to be of a certain belt to be able to compete, such as when he gave a black belt to Daniel so that Daniel could compete.
What do you think the real stuff is?You've learned the basics now it's time to learn the real stuff.
That's the very definition of hazing. I left my last dojo because of that.
Kind of reminds me of John Goodman in The Big Lebowski, every topic goes back to Vietnam.Seems an unhealthy obsession. Just based on the many many many many many many threads you've started here about that obsession.
In all fairness, many of us repeat "black belt is just the beginning" because that's what we're all told (at least in karate, anyway). In my opinion, only kanchos and kaichos should be made to answer for that statement, not the students who are merely repeating what they've been taught.What do you think the real stuff is?
I also see what you did there...Something tells me you missed the point of that post...
I was wondering if anyone would catch itI also see what you did there...
Which is?
Drax did. Hid reflexes are too fast!I was wondering if anyone would catch it
So at that dojo it sounds like they just hand out black belts to anybody who can afford them which would be anybody with £10 no matter how skilled, or unskilled, they are.
In short, any bozo with £10 can get a black belt at that dojo.
Yeah, what about it?
I think this example in particular depends entirely on the style and the school. In TKD Kukkiwon and ITF say the whole black belt is a beginner thing, but in early books circa 1959-1961 black belt in TKD was referenced as a "high level of expertise". In bjj a black belt is an expert and is closer to what is expected of 4th dan in TKD and some karate. Kyokushin black belts are high level fighters but not necessarily masters of their art. Not all black belts are equal and that is okay as long as the standard is made clear and is kept consistent.I sometimes notice that there are big contradictions in the martial arts. For instance, and I've discussed this before, how they will say that being a first degree black belt doesn't mean you're a master or even an expert it just means you're a serious beginner, but then they make it so hard to get that you practically have to be a master to get it. Sounds very contradictory to me.
I have an idea that will lay all that to rest.Ok. So.
You are supposed to want your black belt and look up to others who have their black belt and treat them differently because of their increased standing in the community.
But they can't go around just saying they are better than you. That isn't cool martial arts spirituality.
So you say you don't want it. And that you are just starting your journey as a way of not only saying you are better than everyone because of the black belt. But that you are also better because you are so humble about the achievement.
It is a social convention to rationalise the process.
It is like at Christmas when the pudding comes out. You have to refuse it first. To excuse yourself for eating it.
Do it and record it. It's like the videos where the black belt goes into a gym and pretends to be a white belt, but in reverse. And comedy ensues!Double down. Buy the black belt. Start training with it. They won't mind because a black belt is just a symbol anyway.
See if they are true to their convictions.
To further expand on this:But there's one problem: good luck attracting and keeping students with this (though those who really believe what they're saying could weed out the students they claim they don't want by doing this). Whether people want to admit it or not, earning a black belt is a motivator. No one wants it to be "given" to them. I'm not saying that it is "the" motivator - though that's the case for some. But for everyone, it is at least "a" motivator to one extent or another.
I don't agree with it either. Imagine walking into a military recruiter's office, and asking how long it takes to become a general. He then pulls out some stars that he bought from the PX and tries to sell them to you.
I don't know about other countries, but that ended around the time of World War I in the US. I've never heard of commissions being purchased (though I wouldn't argue with you for a second over that; it would be a losing bet to say that it didn't happen), but Theodore Roosevelt joining the Army as a captain and commanding a company during the Spanish American War from the beginning was an example of corruption in how that worked.It's not that long ago that was exactly how one got a military commission and promotion in many countries military, even in the US that didn't allow commission purchasing, wealth and social position enabled many unqualified men to become officers and 'leaders of men'. A more horrifying proposition than being sold a martial arts black belt.
No, it didn't. The children of the affluent are still far more likely to be commissioned officers. In general, do you think a Senator recommends the poor child, or the child of a wealthy campaign donor for admission to the various military academies?I don't know about other countries, but that ended around the time of World War I in the US.