What?Originally posted by Sharp Phil
The profiling guides quoted were written quite some time ago. If you yourself in them, in whole or in part, it should give you pause.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What?Originally posted by Sharp Phil
The profiling guides quoted were written quite some time ago. If you yourself in them, in whole or in part, it should give you pause.
Originally posted by Sharp Phil
The profiling guides quoted were written quite some time ago. If you yourself in them, in whole or in part, it should give you pause.
Originally posted by akja
RSK,
I tought you were better than that! You need to go to: http://www.philelmore.com/ and read his bio, "ITS A MUST READ."
He's a green sash and has been training since 1990 and co-founding his own style and seems to represent everything you don't, I would think that you would ATTACK him at least half as much as YOU ATTACKED ME!
My friend, are you sure you want to quote him
Based on what you've told ARK nobody is are qualified by their "hard core training" alone.
OH YEA. I know he's "the E-Budo, BAD Budo Buster!"
Kinda Ironic, don't ya think?
Originally posted by Sharp Phil
Sorry. It should read, "If you see yourself in them..."
All the profiling guides, including that latest article, cut both ways.
Don Roley, for example, has a reputation for outing frauds and other poseurs, but I've never known him to become obsessive about it or to cross the line. By contrast, I know of one or two other Web denizens who are characterized by a rabid need to find fraudulent behavior where there really is none.
What you should ask yourself is, why did the people with whom you were arguing quote pieces of my profiling guides to you? Resist the urge to dismiss this simply as some failing on their parts. Instead, ask yourself, "Do I see myself represented in these profiles?"
Then ponder why, and what you should do about it.
No profile is definitive. Warnings are just that -- warning signs. Sometimes a windmill is just a windmill. Other times, though, it's a monster.
Originally posted by Seig
For those of us not familiar, would you please explain what that rank means.
Originally posted by RyuShiKan
I was referring to the section on his website about “Trolls”, “Combat Posers” & “Cyber Sensei”.
All of those articles make a great deal of sense and point out with great accuracy some of the dorks on the Internet.
As for his martial arts training I never asked about itÂ…Â…Â…nor do I care.
Originally posted by SteelShadow
I asked this one time but you may have missed it.What style do you study and what orginizations do you belong to.You seem to have quiet abit of knowledge on a wide range of arts.I am genuinly curious?
Good way to put it, especially when I just reread Don QuixoteOriginally posted by Sharp Phil
Sorry. It should read, "If you see yourself in them..."
All the profiling guides, including that latest article, cut both ways.
Don Roley, for example, has a reputation for outing frauds and other poseurs, but I've never known him to become obsessive about it or to cross the line. By contrast, I know of one or two other Web denizens who are characterized by a rabid need to find fraudulent behavior where there really is none.
What you should ask yourself is, why did the people with whom you were arguing quote pieces of my profiling guides to you? Resist the urge to dismiss this simply as some failing on their parts. Instead, ask yourself, "Do I see myself represented in these profiles?"
Then ponder why, and what you should do about it.
No profile is definitive. Warnings are just that -- warning signs. Sometimes a windmill is just a windmill. Other times, though, it's a monster.
Originally posted by RyuShiKan
Maybe we need to issue a set of playing cards like they have for the ex-Iraqi leaders.
Originally posted by RyuShiKan
Next, dan certificates from shodan up are never done on a word processorÂ…...as this one is...Â…kyu ranks are sometimes mass produced but not dan ranks. They are hand written by the instructor.
(Note the poor hand writing for the dan grade and rank. )
Originally posted by SteelShadow
I have seen where some dan tests ranged from 75.00 to 500.00dollars.My question is whats the point of paying such high fees its a rip off.If you have been studying a art for 5 10 or 20 yrs and you are testing for a high dan rank why should they charge you such a high amount.You have already proven your worth and dedication as well as your hard work.I believe the test should be given with little or no cost personaly.I mean what are you realy paying for?.You pay dues every month to train you pay for uniforms equipment and such.So your teacher or his peers have to set thru your testing.Its not worth great amounts of money just for that.If you want to honor them with a gift so be it.But paying hundreds of dollars on top of your already paying dues.And then even having to pay for the belt you earned anyway.Its just another way to line someones pocket in my oppion.My students pay monthly dues and they pay for the gi's.
But there is no charge for a rank test of any level.They earned that test they earned the right to take it.And in MHO its wrong for me to charge them for something they have already earned to begin with.I even pay for there belts.I was just wondering why so many people think its ok to pay hundreds of dollars for a test?
Originally posted by Don Roley
If they don't care about rank, then they will never go tot he trouble of getting it in the first place. So I have troule understanding the idea that someone can claim rank and then say they do not think it is important when asked to prove it.
Originally posted by KennethKu
Note: I do not mean to imply that Kukkiwon is the ONLY recognized authority of TKD. You can be part of other legitimate federations. However, Smith's "Garage Federation" is pure crap.
Originally posted by RyuShiKan
This thread could be about ability if someone were to make some extravagant claim on the Internet…like “I killed a charging bear by using only my tooth brush and my internal powers of ki”…..but so far that has not really been the topic and won’t be until I see such claims.
Originally posted by D.Cobb
I can't agree with this one. Rank as such does not mean much to me, but the knowledge and level of training that goes with it does. So I have qualified to a certain level, do I say that because I don't really care if I can be called by a Dan ranking, then I shouldn't go any further?
Or do I go further because there are things I need to learn that will make my technique knowledge so much better?
I don't know exactly, but I'm pretty sure legit kenpo organizations have their own methods of preventing forgery, fraud, etc. Word processed? Maybe for something like a certain mark in the color belts, but for high dan ranks, I could see people taking measures on how to protect their name.Originally posted by D.Cobb
I think this would be true for Japanese or Okinawan systems, but what about those systems from other places around the world, where ancient traditions aren't held in such high esteem? Obviously I am talking of those systems that have stood the test of time, and have proven themselves to be valid. You know systems like American Kenpo and such like.
--Dave
Originally posted by D.Cobb
This post will be even funnier if you happen to know just how dentally challenged I am.