ChingChuan
Blue Belt
Ching, I think we could just be running into a very small linguistic problem of interpretation here.
From my view, the thread has been dealing with the fact that there are ways of applying corrective criticism that foster an instructional consequence and other ways that do nothing but tell a student what they did was not right without helping them find a way to do it right.
(....)
That's what I think people are referring to in the thread when they are talking about not being critical. It isn't not saying the student is doing something wrong, it's saying it in a way that helps them not do it again.
Hm, but to me it seems as though some people perceive something to be 'destructive criticism' while it isn't... That was what I'm saying...
But now we're talking about a society in which some people can't take criticism anymore. The example that Kacey gave us, speaks for itself - apparently, some people can't stand being corrected, even if it's done in the most gentle and caring method possible... If this 'modern culture-specific way' includes that you almost don't dare to say that it's wrong, well, then I wonder whether that's the right way...Phoenix 44 said:That's not to say that students shouldn't be corrected, taught, or steered in the proper direction, but there is no reason why we shouldn't be taught in a modern, culture-specific way.
As for the respect issue: I wouldn't trust the opinion of someone I don't respect... For me, respect is 'all-compassing', so if a teacher would have a very low moral standard, I wouldn't respect him, nor his teachings... Still, if he was the only one who was teaching that art or if he was exceptionally good I might still want to accept his criticism - but I don't think I'd want to train with such a person at all.