If all one is interested in is getting sustenance, they don't need to go beyond peanut butter & jelly and tuna fish sandwiches. It's effective and quick serves its purpose. So why spend time learning to cook? But one will never become a gourmet chef and appreciate complex flavors if expediency is the only concern.
It's possible now, it seems, to be happy communicating by text with LOL, WTF, OMG, and other shorthand (that I know nothing about). Quick and effective, so what is the incentive to actually learn to spell, use compound sentences and be able to write prose or poetry?
By short circuiting the "plodding path," the job may get done, but the art and its intricacies are lost. The style, which gave birth to the quick and effective techniques, suffers. Perhaps there should be a distinction between a fighting method and a martial "art." A method can be learned quickly, to learn an art may take decades. A method does not contain the full art. But the art will contain the method. However, nothing precludes one from following both paths simultaneously, if they wish.
It all depends on what you want to get out of the activity. I'm a creative cook and like to add subtle flavors of several ethnic cuisines. Time consuming and a lot to clean up, but I really enjoy the meal. But I can still make a peanut butter & jelly sandwich with the best of them.
Did I come close, GPS?