Bald Bob said:
Superdave, I hate to burst your bubble but the majority of education is now done at a distance. Video is one of the most sophisticated forms. Throughout the world, continuing education for neurosurgeons, attorneys, psychologists, and for that matter almost every profession is largely done at a distance.
Since I am a member of Grandmaster Roman's studio my thoughts about his programs are based on empirical evidence rather than your thoughts which are apparently based on pure conjecture. I have seen his students who have trained by video and then come to his studio to perform what they have learned -- and they do quite well.
SDave, your syntax and vocabulary suggest you have a college degree or something close -- which makes me surprised at your ignorance of modern learning methods. Captious criticism of what you have never seen goes beyond ignorance into the realm of being mean-spirited and stupid.
Next time you choose to humiliate yourself why don't you choose a less public forum?
Okay. Let's try
this for a quick sec.
1. Empirical evidence refers to a thing observed, and nothing more. The rigors of research via the empirical method are simply ways to solidify consistencies between what one person observes under controlled circumstances, and what another observes under that same set of controlled circumstances. I
EMPIRICALLY OBSERVED the information posted by Chief Roman, on
HIS website, repeatedly. Found bupkiss there about quality controls via personal interaction, testing, etc. I even looked in the fine print, hoping to find something other than some guy selling a black belt in EPAK. The charge of conjecture would have been applicable had I not referenced
the webesite, in a discussion about the contents of
the website...had I pulled a Johnny carson, holding an envelope to my forehead. You are a proud student of the Chief, so I'll tell you what: You read the website, and let me know where it says what so many of us have managed to miss, that I was forced to conject about due to the absence of information to the contrary. Or is he blatantly practicing bait and switch? Unsuspecting guy invests good chunk of change,
then Roman sez, "actually, you gotta come train."?
2. Ignorance of Modern Learning Methods. Do you read any other threads on MT? Unlike many of the other distinguished members of this fora, I did not have the pleasure of training for years with Edmund K. Parker. What I did have the pleasure of doing with him was
directly related to my my knowledge of learning methods. Mr. Parker mentioned Superlearning in one of the Infinite Insights books. I thought this was cool, since I'd been studying accelerated learning methods for many years, and co-founded the Accelerated Learning Institute with professors in learning theory, cognitive psychology, social cognition, and other LEARNING and communication-related fields. Mr. White formally introduced me to him at a seminar in Costa Mesa, where we arranged to have discussions and sessions at a later time about developments in the fields of accelerated learning and performance improvement (I was from Hawaii, and named Dave...which he seemed to dial in on as it was the name of a brother or brother-in-law of his). Did that; was to summarize the main ideas in a series of articles and a book with his assistance. Mr. Parker passed while I was in Europe. I did
not learn secret kenpo teachings (this one is for you, Doc), or anything of the sort. Nor did I press him for anything, though the temptation was certainly there (everybody wanted something from him). Just spoke and met a few times with a very kind, friendly, and accepting man, who incidently used to say, "Be careful of who you have your picture taken with." BTW, I am deeply ignorant about how to change the oil in my own car. If you would like to modify your assertions for contextual relevancy, I will be glad to consider them as valid observations, and consider them appropriately.
3. Captious criticism of what I have never seen. Hmm. I have
seen the
website at issue in this forum. Have you
seen me?..."beyond ignorance into the realm of being mean-spirited and stupid"... Sound 'captious' enough for ya? Certainly seems to
me like a mean-spirited thing to say.
My comments have been -- in this and other threads -- critical of Chief Romans buy-by-night black belt over the web. He may teach in person, and may even produce very good students from among those he personally teaches. Selling the representation of a significant accomplishment cheapens the meaning for those who trained long and hard for similar belts; similar certificates. Even people on the outskirts of kenpo should have enough respect for the dearly departed so as not to diminish the value of their lifes work by making the representation of it a package deal at a bargain basement price. Specifically, Mr. Roman holds himself out (certainly through inference, if not by direct claim) as an 8th degree black in Ed Parkers Kenpo, and offers web students the chance to be 1st degree black belts in EPAK for a check or money order made out to...
Last time I looked, Mr. Parker had only directly promoted the highest ranking of his personal, long time students to 7th degree black prior to his passing. Many of the top seniors in kenpo have since added to their rank, appropriately (in my mind) considering they ARE the most senior members of the system, and a system should not die with it's founder. Last I checked, Adrian Roman is not even close to being one of Ed Parkers' top seniors. Tatum, White, LaBounty, Planas, Trejo, Palanzo (sp?), Ch...something or other, and other familiar names are people with the right to wear higher ranks since the old mans passing. Roman is not. For Pete's sake, Robert Perry, a close friend and long-time student of Mr. Parkers with
YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!! of direct contact and training only dared promote himself to 8th degree (recieving Mr. Parkers blessing as evidenced by his signature on Perry's 8th degree certificate)...the same kenpo rank claimed by Chief Roman. Am I to believe, even for a second, that these two gentleman are/were (RIP, Mr. Perry) equals in their understanding of Mr. Parkers kenpo?
Pshahh!
Perhaps it is Mr. Roman who should find less public places to humiliate himself, THEN THE
WORLD WIDE WEB!!!
Aside for this, welcome to MT, and I look forward to your more meaningful contributions.
Regards,
Dr. Dave (note: NOT Superdave)