If you post a question, in a professional tone and without the agenda I will respond in like manner.
Or perhaps you can assume that my question is a professional one and take it from there.
Yes it would. It would be a good ole boy promotion.
What if someone said that is what your organization did, the committee promotes the head person who in turn promotes those that promoted him. Isn't that a good ole boy promotion as well? I don't know if you are caucasian, but assuming that you are, how would you respond if someone accused your past promotional practices as racist? I don't see any asian names in your dan registry, for example.
Particularly if the GM hasn't taken part in, or seen the training. There is no justification for this amount of grade skipping. Not only does it cheat the individual of valuable learning for the sake of walking around as a 'master', it cheapens the art as a whole.
And what art? Taekwondo? You and your organization changed the name to Kong Soo Do. So what is your stake in what the reputation of Taekwondo is or is not?
Yes, I suppose the GM can do whatever he wants. His school, his rules. That doesn't make it right, proper or wise to do.
If that is how you feel, then you should be prepared to have people make comments about your organization's promotional practices. In a lot of people's minds, one year between 6th and 7th Dan is not enough time in grade, no matter how much time has passed since your promotion to karate 1st Dan or what you think your justifications are.
That's fine. How is that working out for them? Again, serious question.
It's working out fine as far as I can tell. Again, 7 million poom and dan holders, they must be doing something right. Frankly I think that the US alone should have that many Kukkiwon poom and dan holders by this point.
And it is not that the Kukkiwon doesn't have standards. I can tell you that the Kukkiwon special test that was held at US Open a couple of years ago was a big problem for the Kukkiwon. A lot of people showed up and obviously did not know even the most basic material. There was a special poomsae seminar prior to the special test, and a whole bunch of people felt so poorly that they walked out and never even took their test. Of those that did take the test, many failed due to extremely poor technical ability. On top of that, USAT, who hosted the special seminar and test, kept a lot of the promotion fees and did not forward that to the Kukkiwon. Under the Kukkiwon promotion rules, a skip dan candidate is required to pay the promotion fee for all skipped ranks. So if you are going from 1st to 4th, you have to pay the promotion fee for 2nd, 3rd and 4th Dan. But USAT was submitting only the 4th Dan fee and keeping the rest. It was such a headache for the International Department that they swore never to do it again.
The Kukkiwon recognizes that many American Taekwondoin failed to be timely promoted like they should have been. What they didn't realize is that perhaps one of the reasons why American Taekwondoin weren't promoted was because they failed to continue with their training and studies, and had one year of experience 30 times, instead of 30 years of experience. They also were not prepared to deal with the extreme disrespect and hostility they received when the some of the skip dan promotion recommendations could not be honored. I do not mind saying that it put a very sour taste in the Kukkiwon's mouth to see that aspect of Taekwondo to the point where they are extremely reluctant to move forward in this direction again, which makes for even more bitterness, hostility and resentment.
I am beginning to think there is no solution for this. I think this is just the way it is at this point, which is why a growing number of my seniors as well as myself and Mastercole, feel like not helping anymore. For what? What is the point?
A lot of people really enjoy reading the things that I write because to them I represent a very traditional way of thinking. It gives them a point of reference in which to access where they are on the scale of tradition vs. non-tradition. When they see people who oppose my viewpoint, they see it as the struggle between tradition and non-tradition. I notice that the gap seems to be getting larger as time passes by. One of my juniors said it best I think when he said that I am a kind, generous person who he would trust with his life, the only challenge being that you have to negotiate through the thick wall of tradition to get there. My response was that I didn't build the thick wall of tradition; that the wall was always there, and it was there for good reason.