Lovely, Wes... not actually accurate in the slightest, but lovely.
May be I should say "for some systems".
You phrased it pretty definitively... but, even with that qualification, I'd still be rather reticent to say anything specific about what one rank or another signifies across the board... it just doesn't work that way.
IMO, the higher ranking is usually obtained from
- book publishing,
- DVD releasing,
- competition team training,
- tournament responding,
- workshop offering,
- public demo.
- ...
and is not from personal combat ability grading. It's how much that you have contributed to your art. So higher rank may not necessary mean higher combat skill and ability.
Tournaments? Competition? DVD's? Books? Wow, I'm never going to get anywhere in, well, any of my systems...
Look, it's certainly true that physical combative performance isn't always at the top of the list of criteria for rank, but I'd even say that looking only at combative skill and ability is never at the top. Specific skill and ability within the art being trained, on the other hand, which might be combatively applied or applicable, is going to be there. But thinking of martial arts and ranking as only being about such mundane and low-level criteria simply doesn't take you very far... if that's all there is to martial arts training, and to attaining or being awarded rank, then martial arts training would only really apply for a short time, and the highest ranked people would all be in their 20's.
Talking to the sensei and asking questions is not a substitute for hard work. Rather, its to make sure that your hard work is also smart work. Lets say that you're a runner, you run track. Now let's say you aren't running properly, maybe there is something wrong with your stride that makes it slower than if you ran the right way. If you keep practicing your stride the wrong way, all the hard work in the world will just make you better at running the wrong way. If on the other hand if you talk to your coach and ask him if you need to fix anything about your running technique, if he's a good coach he will tell you what your doing wrong and how to fix it. Then, you have to work hard and apply what your coach said so you can become a better runner. That's when you shut up and train. No, talking to the coach is not some magical replacement for hard work, but that way you make sure that your hard work is smart work, and that you're applying it the right way. After all, what good is hard work if its not done right?
If he's a good coach, he'll catch it before you do. You won't need to ask.
Ask for clarification if you don't understand. Ask if you're stuck in your development. Ask if you want guidance. If you're doing something badly, you shouldn't have to ask. But, and this is a big one, what is "doing something badly" can vary wildly based on the student themselves... a beginner who is getting nearly everything "wrong", but has started to at least put the right foot forward this time, is congratulated on what they're doing right, and maybe given one more pointer ("Good, that's it. Just see if you can make sure you catch from above next time"), but a senior (brown or black) who got nearly everything right would be picked up on a subtle aspect of what went wrong, or can be improved ("You really need to make sure you drop into this, you're not getting anywhere near enough power"). But a good instructor should be able to see what each individual student needs without being asked. If not... look for a different teacher. I mean, you don't have to expect them to be a mind-reader, but they should be able to observe and provide proper guidance.
You take things one step at a time. A white belt should not be so focused on getting a black belt, rather they should be concentrating on getting a yellow belt of whatever belt comes after white which usually is yellow in lots of styles. After yellow belt, the student should then be focusing on getting the next belt up, and so forth. As for getting a black belt, you cross that bridge when you get to it. However, the important thing is that when you do get to that bridge to cross it. A student who is a high level brown belt, the rank right before black belt, should be focusing on getting their black belt and if necessary should talk to their sensei about what they need to do to get it. Of course the student has to do the work, but a good sensei should give the student the necessary information about the work they need to do.
Sometimes what the student needs is to wait.
Academics also requires lots of solo time training at home called studying.
Not exactly the same thing...
An A is an achievement in academics, a black belt is an achievement in the martial arts. Aside from that, I don't see much difference. If you or anyone else sees other differences between the two marks of achievement, I would like to hear your feedback.
Okay, an A is an indication of a single performance of academic knowledge. A black belt is a result of a long-term study and engagement in practice. It is an incremental development, a culmination of many lessons, multiple experiences, and years of work. There can be a single "test" for a black belt, but it's really not about that. It's about everything that went before it... that's really what a black belt is about. The A is all about the test.
From there, it's important to realise just why an academic study is quite different to a physical, over-arching area. Academics are about memorisation and recall, as well as application of formula, martial arts are about development of physical skills. The neuro-physiology is different, the learning methodology is different, the application and testing methodology is different, and so on...
If it sounds like Im not listening than perhaps its because I'm not getting the point entirely at first. It might take a bit, especially since communication on message boards has severe limitations. This will take some patience. After all, its been discussed before about how patience is an important virtue in the martial arts. We should all practice it, and Im not excluding myself on this.
Yeah, it can be a little difficult at times.
In my dojo, my sensei did keep me in the dark, although it was perhaps my fault. There was this myth in my dojo that to take the black belt test you had to wait until the sensei told you that you could take it. I should've asked my sensei if it was true, that you had to wait for him to tell you that you could test for the black belt. As I said, it was a myth so it wasn't true but it was a very prevalent myth. If I had asked my sensei about it he would've dispelled the myth.
Ask for clarification... that's a good plan. Believing in myths... not so good...