FieldDiscipline
2nd Black Belt
Some think he was on the payroll of the American CIA.
Hadn't heard that one. Very interesting. Is that just hearsay or has anyone gone on record etc to suggest that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Some think he was on the payroll of the American CIA.
I thought that may catch an eye or 2. Good ready FieldDiscipline. The answer is yes & no. No one went on record to suggest that directly that I am aware of. However some have said both on & off the record that they believe that the US CIA funded Gen Choi's 1973 ITF TKD world tour.Hadn't heard that one. Very interesting. Is that just hearsay or has anyone gone on record etc to suggest that?
Quote:Originally Posted by KarateMomUSA
As the KCIA stepped up there efforts, the ITF was near total collapse. In 1979 Gen Choi went to north Korea where he cut a deal with that totalitarian regime in exchange for support of the ITF. The next year (1980) he introduced his Taekwon-Do there. This was treason & was viewed even by many of his most loyal supporters as being an "anti-nationalist act". This gave the south Korean dictator(s) plenty of ammunition to wipe him out.
I am not sure when Gen Choi became a Canadian citizen, we could both check. I write mostly off the top of my head. However I don't think it is too important for the point I am trying to make, which is:
Technically: Now I do not know how south Korean law treats those born in Korea. Some countries allow or tolerate dual citizenship. Some require you to renounce your past citizenship before granting the new citizenship. If you renounced your original citizenship, your birth nation at times will cancel your citizenship. But I honestly do not know.
But it does not matter to me or many. He was after all a founding member of the ROK Army, a 2 star major general who wrote the 1st manual on military intelligence for the ROK, his countries 1st Ambassador ever to Malaysia, plus he gave them his TKD which provided them with a powerful propaganda tool & has been used to assist their KGB & intelligence services. Please understand that TKD was point #8 in the 10 points of agreement that the 2 leaders of Korea listed for their agenda to work together & help them achieve steps to reunification.
So regardless of the technical status of the law, he was viewed as a traitor for his outrageous move to the north which was an anti-nationalist act from the south Korean perspective.
So this emotional topic is best left up to individuals to judge.
He was indeed a very complex man, involved in many complex controversies, which knowledge is most definitely needed if one is to sort out all the confusion & conflicting stories about TKD's history & development.
I am sorry I tried to explain further & I thought that it may help temper my original remarks that I have now amended above to: This was considered by many south Koreans as a treasonous actI beg to differ. It's extremely important if you're interested in putting forth accurate information. As far as I know, it's impossible for someone to be guilty of treason if they aren't a citizen of the country in question.
Undoubtedly the ROK government - and many, many normal Koreans - would have viewed Gen. Choi's trip to NK with great suspicion. But he had already left SK for Canada and was, IIRC, a Canadian citizen before 1979. They could be upset all they wanted, they could view him with contempt, say he was a communist, etc. But he certainly wasn't guilty of treason if this was the case.
This misses my point. It is not a question of citizenship, dual or not. It is a matter of whether or not south Korean law would still govern his actions. Some countries will always consider you, if you are born in their country, a citizen subject to their laws no matter where you live. For example, some countries allow you to vote in their elections even if you live abroad, like Israel, which also I think makes military service mandatory as well. Italy has a somewhat similar provision for dual citizens. Americans living abroad that are dual citizens are still subject to US tax laws. I know Master Choi Jung Hwa, while he already served time in Canadian federal prison for a plot to kill the south Korean military dictator Gen Chun Do Hwan, had to face prosecutors & NIS (KCIA) investigators when he was finally allowed back in south Korea, home of his birth, after living abroad for decades as a Canadian citizen. I also think that south Korean prosecutors could have charged him with a crimes, even though the plot took place in Canada & he served his time there. So I am not 100% sure of the law in south Korea for Koreans. It is something worth researchingI seriously doubt Gen. Choi had dual citizenship as he was trying to distance himself from the SK dictatorship as much as possible for his own safety. Nothing in his autobiography indicates that he retained SK citizenship.
Again I see you valid point & have amended comment above. But I honestly don't know how th south Korean law is written. I know that over the years, the puppet president & the military dictators have always stretched provisions as they were & are in a technical state of war, with no formal peace treaty ever signed. They always claimed national security & I am sure at times it was more than justifiedSure. But anyone can be viewed in a particular way even if, legally, they don't qualify. Treason is a very specific charge. There are plenty of things for which Gen. Choi can be legitimately criticized. I'm not sure this is one of them.
True enough. Which is why throwing around terms like "treason" when it's not appropriate doesn't help.
Quote:Originally Posted by KarateMomUSA
As the KCIA stepped up there efforts, the ITF was near total collapse. In 1979 Gen Choi went to north Korea where he cut a deal with that totalitarian regime in exchange for support of the ITF. The next year (1980) he introduced his Taekwon-Do there. This was considered by many south Koreans as a treasonous act & was viewed even by many of his most loyal supporters as being an "anti-nationalist act". This gave the south Korean dictator(s) plenty of ammunition to wipe him out.
I am not sure when Gen Choi became a Canadian citizen, we could both check. I write mostly off the top of my head. However I don't think it is too important for the point I am trying to make, which is:
I am sorry I tried to explain further & I thought that it may help temper my original remarks that I have now amended above to: This was considered by many south Koreans as a treasonous act
This misses my point. It is not a question of citizenship, dual or not. It is a matter of whether or not south Korean law would still govern his actions.
Some countries will always consider you, if you are born in their country, a citizen subject to their laws no matter where you live. For example, some countries allow you to vote in their elections even if you live abroad, like Israel, which also I think makes military service mandatory as well. Italy has a somewhat similar provision for dual citizens.
Americans living abroad that are dual citizens are still subject to US tax laws.
I know Master Choi Jung Hwa, while he already served time in Canadian federal prison for a plot to kill the south Korean military dictator Gen Chun Do Hwan, had to face prosecutors & NIS (KCIA) investigators when he was finally allowed back in south Korea, home of his birth, after living abroad for decades as a Canadian citizen. I also think that south Korean prosecutors could have charged him with a crimes, even though the plot took place in Canada & he served his time there. So I am not 100% sure of the law in south Korea for Koreans. It is something worth researching
Again I see you valid point & have amended comment above. But I honestly don't know how th south Korean law is written. I know that over the years, the puppet president & the military dictators have always stretched provisions as they were & are in a technical state of war, with no formal peace treaty ever signed. They always claimed national security & I am sure at times it was more than justified
Yes very good points & I should have said viewed it as treasonous etc. But also please keep in mind, Gen Choi did more than just set foot in the north & he set his feet there are many occasions, including being laid to rest there. I certainly can see the view point of south Koreans that are bitter towards Gen Choi for what they think was way past the line, even many of his most loyal instructors felt that his going to the north gave aid & comfort to their enemy & could no longer follow him, with some never being able to forgive him. This is a valid emotion, but your points I can not debate against, as they are valid & may even be technically or legally correct, which was your basic point.Sure, Korean law can still hold guilty someone who simply sets foot in North Korea, even if they aren't a Korean citizen (I suppose, for the sake of argument). But to equate that act with treason is to empty it of meaning. Treason covers disloyalty to one's sovereign nation. South Korea could be upset all it wanted, it could have tried to prosecute Gen. Choi for some other crime (which, as far as I know, it didn't do). It could do a lot of things. But it couldn't consider him guilty of treason.
Gen Choi was clearly a Canadian citizen according to Canadian law. I still do not know his status according to the ROK law. Their laws may still consider him a citizen no matter how many other citizen ships he obtained outside of Korea, as he was born Korean. If I am not mistaken, I may have read elsewhere that Koreans living abroad may still be required to serve in the military. But this is all speculation that will only be settled if someone cites the actual law.But, again, my point was that treason applies only to citizens of the state in question and possibly legal residents of the state in question. Because treason deals with crimes against one's sovereign state. Gen. Choi, as far as I can ascertain, wasn't a Korean citizen when he visited NK.
Yes of course. But south Korea may still consider him a citizen & he was a high ranking member of their govt, in charge of military intelligence at a time. Gen Choi & who he was, certainly raised the bar, at least for some in the public perception arena, if not the legal arenaOh, I don't doubt that. But how a non-citizen's trip to North Korea would qualify as trying to overthrow his soveriegn state is beyond me. Could he be guilty of something else for simply setting foot in North Korea? Well, maybe. But a Canadian citizen trying to "overthrow" the government of South Korea - when they aren't even a temporary resident in the ROK - isn't engaged in treason.
What I can tell you about Dr He Young Kimm is that I believe his book will be most comprehensive. I think he is an honest educated man with an earned academic doctorate in history. PhD degrees are terminal degrees usually granted for research that adds new knowledge to the existing body of knowledge. The course work is not only designed in your academic specialty (in this case history), but in in-depth research skills as well. I think that we are blessed as Dr Kimm is also a Korean grandmaster that speaks the language & lived in Korea during the time that some of these events unfolded.
Please Sir, you may not have the point of view that I have, but please do not misunderstand what I wrote, which was: he "lived in Korea during the time that some of these events unfolded".I have known Dr. Kimm personally for about twenty five years now, when he started visiting GM Ji's San Bruno dojang in the 80's. His father in law, who lived in Fremont, was sick, so he spent several months in Northern California. I even posed for pictures in his book once. One thing though, is that he was NOT there when things unfolded, at least with respect to Taekwondo. He came to the US in 1963, and prior to that, was not really into the Taekwondo scene.