I am not very familiar with The kajukenbo Forms that were created by Sijo and the other founders, but my question is, do the forms have the self-defense techniques in them that are taught within your system? Or, are they just forms and then you do self defense? I know myself and others out here are trying to understand their forms better so they can teach the forms as a long fight but also have the ability to break them down into, as you say, self defense sets as independent parts of their system. I would think that if we could reinforce our forms by using the techniques as independent self-defense situations it would be better for our students learning curve.
Thank You,
Jesse
Contrary to what some now claim, James Mitose only taught 1 form, "naihanchi shodan". William Chow taught it sparingly. Sijo Emperado learned it from Chow.
The 14 Palama Sets of Kajukenbo were developed by Sijo and his brother Joe Emperado (# 4 & #7). #11 closely resembles "naihanchi shodan", and has the nickname "dance of death". The rest of the katas were designed from techniques that were practiced as individual techniques.
They mostly teach individual techniques, instead of a series of techniques. Let's use Palama Set 8 as a example. It's called the kicking kata, because it's all kicks. It develops balance and kicking ability, but doesn't really follow the common mindset of defending against different attackers. It just helps you practice different kicks. Most of the katas are like that, practicing techniques, instead of multiple attacker scenarios.
Our self defense techniques are different because of the combination of stand up techniques with a heavy usage of judo and jujitsu techniques. Things you won't see in our katas.
In our katas, a kick is a kick, a block is a block, a punch is a punch, etc. So we spend little or no time on kata application. In fact about the only time I discuss the application is when a student asks "what this for"?
I've seen the SKK "Pinans" and katas, and don't recognize any that are from Kajukenbo. I've heard some SKK people say that the horse stance with a upward X block is from Kajukenbo, but it's not done the Kajukenbo way in the SKK katas. So when I see it, it's just a horse stance and X block. If it was done the Kajukenbo way, it would be done in a series of 5 movements, not 2.
I can see where application is more important in the SKK Pinans since they come from common Okinawan/Japanese systems.
But in my case with Kajukenbo katas, their mostly practiced to develop proficiency in technique, stance, and balance. Like punching and kicking in the air.
Timing and movement is developed from the various punch counters, knife counters, grab arts, sparring, etc.