If such heavy criticism is going to be applied to Alan Orr's work, I thought "turn about" was only "fair play"!!
So your argument is "Alan isn't the only one with a disconnect between training, theory, and fighting"...
I have to say that's not a very flattering line of argument for Alan, and not one I would take.
You can go ahead and assume you have proven my VT to be horrible. Everyone in my lineage totally sucks. No video necessary.
That brings us not one step closer to proving Alan's claims of unbalancing "bridge" skills being directly applicable in a fight.
You could say we're "blind to it", and Alan already has, but no one can even point to a single timestamp on any of their many fight videos and say "here it is".
A completely inexperienced person would be able to watch the opponent and see them being unbalanced by "bridge" contact. But it can't be pointed to.
I think Alan knows this, but is at this point too invested in the method, what with all the DVDs, online mentorship, and new book he's trying to sell.
That's why when pressed on the question, rather than pointing to a timestamp, he loses his temper, issues challenge fights, and demands MMA records or videos.
That is nothing but an attempt to discredit the questioner to divert the question.
So again, assuming or even proving my VT is horrible doesn't demonstrate Alan's Force Flow unbalancing "bridge" skills actually work in fighting.
Deflect all you want. So far, it has not been, and apparently can't be, demonstrated.
And in fact, all their fight videos are evidence that it is not applicable.