parmandjack said:
Well....
I've got to step in at this point and state that the arrogance pervasive throughout all the posts from heretic is making me want to vomit....
It's great to see your ability to show compassion.
you are correct in that all other religions are on the wrong paths to salvation... only through a relationship with Jesus Christ will a person be saved.
Saved from what?
Everyone cannot be right at the same time when the claims are polar opposites, 180 degrees diametrically opposed.. and yes heretic... Christianity IS in total disagreement with other religions... regardless of your shallow claim of knowledge of its extreme similarities... Christianity (true biblically based Christianity) claims that salvation is exclusively through Jesus Christ - other religions say its not.. how do you pretend that there is harmony in those two claims? There is none...
You claim to be a biblical scholar, so I'll assume that you have a reasonable understanding of its content. Tell me, do you feel the value of the publication, in terms of how it relates to Christianity, is the literal translation of the original Hebrew text, or the underlying message? Do you really believe that the underlying messages of any other positive spiritual religeons are that diametrically opposed to the message of Christianity?
Have you studied them, or are you guessing?
Either one party is right and the other wrong, or both are wrong.. but not everyone can be right.
Sounds to me like you focus on a lot of literal references.....
Jesus taught using the parable, why do you suppose this was?
I am a biblical scholar and a student of eschatology...and YES... I CAN provide you with factual evidences supporting the historical, scientific and supernatural claims of the Bible, both Old AND New Testaments...
The greater issue though is... WILL I.... and the answer is NO...
Then why bring it up?
and I refuse to enter into a debate with a close-minded individual such as yourself,
1. That's what the Study is for. If you don't want to play, then don't get in the sandbox.
2. The Study is not intended to be a place where you single out somone with whom you disagree and insult their intelligence. Let's stop that right now. K?
Back to the discussion...
As for your "Logic" (notice the quote/unquote) that now gives you knowledge that feeds your arrogance... 5 honest minutes of searching the internet will give you months of data to read that will easily and quickly shatter your religious beliefs... and don't think for a second that your atheism is anything other than another form of religion...
As a biblical scholar, I presume you have developed the ability to analyze text, in order to interpret the meaning of said text. You might think about applying that skill to more of heretic888's posts. I don't think aethiest is an approprite interpretation.
Anyways.. my vomiting feelings are gone now... but I have had just enough of your arrogance... If you choose not to believe, I don't care... but don't belittle others...
Matthew 7:12
...the onus, or burden of proof is NOT on us, but on you...
Actually, its on everyone who posts. Look at the thread title.
you can provide "0" evidences supporting your claim that there is no God other than personal opinions based on your own morals (where did those morals come from BTW?), but I could inundate your mail server with proofs FOR HIS Existance...
Again, then why bring it up if you choose not to reveal your evidence? I'm rather interested to see what evidence you can report, and how you may justify it as more reliable or sufficient than the very evidence of heretic's that you seem to refute as inapplicable to this type of knowledge.