TLL is right. There is no requirement to post said information publicly.
As to his other points, I asked a long time ago, never got a reall answer.
Who is the better martial artist?
1st dan Karate, 1st Modern Arnis, 1st Hung Gar, 1st Wing Chun, 1st EPAK, etc?
I'll expand, for the sake of argument here.
Dan Anderson has rank/certification in Modern Arnis, Karate, MA80 and Bram Franks system which I don't recall the name of at the moment.
Tim Hartman has rank/certification in Modern Arnis, Kombatan, Balintawak and Bando.
Who's the better martial artist?
Dan's written more books, maybe that's what counts.
Wait, Tim does more seminars, maybe that's the winner?
Dan has a GM title recognized by some of his peers, but so does Tim. Hmm.....
Well we could go on numerical ranks, but which is higher, a 9th in Kombatan, a 9th in Modern Arnis, a 9th in MA80?
We could count years in, but do we then subtract from Dans quiet period, or give him partial credit?
Do we count black belts produced, or size of organizations?
Or do we simply accept that they both are good, and one may be better than the other for what we are looking for, on any particular day?
Personally, I think they are both good, and I've seen both better and worse than them at seminars and in class. Some things, Dan's the man, others, it's Tim, for others it's both, and sometimes, it's neither. Their numerical ranks, titles, and paper mean less to me today than knowing who they are, and what they can do. Anyone can have paper that calls them Master. Few of them actually can live up to that claim. Dan and Tim can. IMHO.
I said sometime ago, somewhere, in a hut or cave is a damn good martial artist, who could fight and teach rings around everyone I know of, but no one knows of him as he's content in his quiet life.
Take it all for what it is. Back to my pre nap, nap now.
As to his other points, I asked a long time ago, never got a reall answer.
Who is the better martial artist?
1st dan Karate, 1st Modern Arnis, 1st Hung Gar, 1st Wing Chun, 1st EPAK, etc?
I'll expand, for the sake of argument here.
Dan Anderson has rank/certification in Modern Arnis, Karate, MA80 and Bram Franks system which I don't recall the name of at the moment.
Tim Hartman has rank/certification in Modern Arnis, Kombatan, Balintawak and Bando.
Who's the better martial artist?
Dan's written more books, maybe that's what counts.
Wait, Tim does more seminars, maybe that's the winner?
Dan has a GM title recognized by some of his peers, but so does Tim. Hmm.....
Well we could go on numerical ranks, but which is higher, a 9th in Kombatan, a 9th in Modern Arnis, a 9th in MA80?
We could count years in, but do we then subtract from Dans quiet period, or give him partial credit?
Do we count black belts produced, or size of organizations?
Or do we simply accept that they both are good, and one may be better than the other for what we are looking for, on any particular day?
Personally, I think they are both good, and I've seen both better and worse than them at seminars and in class. Some things, Dan's the man, others, it's Tim, for others it's both, and sometimes, it's neither. Their numerical ranks, titles, and paper mean less to me today than knowing who they are, and what they can do. Anyone can have paper that calls them Master. Few of them actually can live up to that claim. Dan and Tim can. IMHO.
I said sometime ago, somewhere, in a hut or cave is a damn good martial artist, who could fight and teach rings around everyone I know of, but no one knows of him as he's content in his quiet life.
Take it all for what it is. Back to my pre nap, nap now.