I agree with most of the listed points in post #123 (
http://www.martialtalk.com/forum/showpost.php?p=337046&postcount=123)
My thinking is that the purpose of martial arts is to provide technical skills to compensate for a lack of physical fitness (so that the weak may defend themselves from the strong, e.g.), so my opinion is that yes, one can be a martial artist without being physically fit.
However I am confused by the compound question:
upnorthkyosa: "Do you think that Martial Arts and Physical Fitness should go hand in hand or do you think one can be a Martial Artist without being physically fit? Why?"
I don't think physical fitness is a requirement to martial arts ability, but I do believe the two go hand in hand.
Colin_Linz:
"
1. Fitness will improve your performance in martial arts.
2. Fitness will improve your life.
3. Training will make you fitter."
I agree with the above to a certain extent - it depends on the art/style.
I don't agree with point 4 (a standard of fitness is required) - again because it depends on the style.
I am further confused because the poll doesn't ask for an opinion on whether fitness is a requirement, but rather asks about a personal assessment of one's own fitness. I suppose the thread starter wanted to gather two sets of data - whatever.