Kembudo-Kai Kempoka
Senior Master
With all due respects, Gary, it's not a case of "I told you so", as much as it is "so what"?GAB said:Hi Dave and Joe,
We can't let this go until the news is out, and it is very close to becoming
"I told you so", but which one of us is going to say it?
Then which one is going to start a different thread to refute that?
Regards, Gary
As long as there are novitiates willing to pay expert level practitioners for the knowledge of how to throw a better strike, punch, kick, throw, etc., it will not matter to the money being exchanged WHERE the lineage of the information came from. It will not matter to the acolyte who did what 50 or 1,000 years ago, as long as the information related to rubber hitting the road (combat applications of fighting arts) stands the tests it is put to.
Which is more important:
a) "After training in this program for 3+ years, will I be able to defend myself against an aggressor, demonstrating skill and confidence, and emerging victorious with a minimum of injury?"
...or...
b) "Is the program I'm training in related through lineage to some guy whom I've never met, may not like if I did, and who died decades before I started training in this program?"
The ultimate challenge to the useful application of any given piece of information lies in the words of the relevancy challenge: "So what?". I've seen nothing in any of these threads that will cause me to change my direction in training, modify how I present the history of my art to students, or even slightly change the price of tea in China.
Percent ratio to relevancy about anything? Zero.
D.
PS -- Don't bother e-mailing me when you find "the truth"...I get enough junk mail already.