Except that I don't make a lot of claims. I answer questions about how I train. I spar, I use resistance, etc. That's not really an outrageous claim - many do that. I don't know how many in Aikido do - it's less usual there, for certain, but these are not uncommon practices in MA. When someone says, "we spar with gear", I don't think, "Prove it!" I simply accept that this is a reasonable practice that happens in some places, and I have no reason to seek proof.
If I were claiming something extraordinary, that would be worth chasing me around asking for proof, perhaps. The only real claim I can remember making is that there are people who have used what I do for self-defense, bouncing, and LEO work with success. That's not the kind of thing I can go out and produce video on - it either got caught on video (and I happen to know about it) or not. I can't change that. I think that's what bothers DB. I can't produce what he most wants, because I'm not aware of any video of it. Mind you, I'm not aware of any video of someone using Savate, Sambo, or BJJ specifically in SD. I can spot some techniques from some of those in videos (as I can spot some of the techniques I train), but I'm simply not aware of video of a single-art practitioner using those to defend themselves.
I've actually made the point about the "aiki" side of Aikido not being often available (a slightly different term than "effective", for reasons I've addressed elsewhere) against a trained opponent. I've made the point that I think training only this side is an issue for that reason, and that NGA also has what I refer to as a "Judo" side. Those techniques can be easily found being used against a resisting opponent, since they actually come from Judo.
I'm not a champion of Aikido. I don't come on here to defend that group of arts. I come on here to discuss things, get and give information, etc. If someone doesn't like Aikido, I'm okay with that. But if they get a bug up their *** and start picking fights in unrelated threads because they don't think Aikido's training methods (an over-generalization that is its own problem) are effective, I don't really see why I should be responsible for their concerns.