Who said WC/WT is an "unbeatable art"? That's stretching it a bit, since it always depends on the practitioner that applies it. I think it's one of the best self defense arts out there, yes, but nothing is unfallable.
Actually, you kinda gave that impression here.
"As for WC/WT being the ultimate art in my opinion. Well sure"
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ultimate[1]
d: the best or most extreme of its kind
I never said it was better than Arnis and kali or other weapon based arts, simply that it incorporates weapons as much as anyother balanced or "well rounded" art. Although, I'm finding that alot of people don't get as far in WC/WT to learn the weapons training. Eitherway, the principles are largely the same. A weapon is an extention of your arm, you use it very similar to how you fight open handed, whatever style.
Hmm..IIRC, in past discussions, I had said that many arts cover a wide variety of areas, ie: weapons, ground work, etc. I also suggested that if one wanted to expand, looking at another art would be necessary. That comment is usually met with people saying that their art has it all. My usual reply is I beg to differ.
I don't see as many limitations in WC/WT I guess as other people might. I guess the style or "lineage" of what I'm taught pretty much covers most bases. I do think it's a superior form of self-defense than some other arts, but again, to call it the "ultimate" would be based on preference and speculation. I would call upon WC/WT before anything else I've EVER trained, any other style I've ever worked with in the past.
See above.
For a test of self defense technique do this: take any technique you learn from anywhere anystyle and try to execute it while standing in a door frame, or lying down on the floor in a narrow door frame. Can it be done in that kind of position? With only that much space to work with? If it can't, I wouldn't train it as much. Chunk it.
Well, of course environment is going to dictate what you can/can't do. Let me give this as an example. Many times, people ask if techiques are trained on both the left and right side. So, a tech. that would normally be done for say a right punch, do that same tech. for a left punch. Now, some do this, and some dont. The ones that dont usually say that there're other techs. that address the left, so why bother trying to modify something. So the same can be said about trying to modify a stand up tech for a ground attack. There are specific ground fighting techs. that address a mount escape, so instead of playing around with a stand up tech., I'm going to use one specifically for the ground.
You get attacked for real that's about all the space you may have, and that "what if" senario is better to be prepared for and made comfortable than not, and finding yourself in a "tight spot" just to Only Then find out that your grappling won't work in the hallway to your apartment, or your spinning kick doesn't work between two parked cars, or that you have a hard time lunging deep in the isle of a bus. Bad times to find that out. Self defense isn't for the mats, the ring, or the dojo, it should be designed what it's intended to be used for. The street.
Yup, many times I've said that the goal of SD should be to be able to adapt on the fly and we should be able to deal with the situation presented to us and modify as necessary. So yes, in those tight quarters, we certainly won't be rolling on the ground, but we will be in the standing grappling/clinch range.