What definition? The incomplete, inaccurate, and largely incorrect one you found, or an actual definition?
In your opinion.
Eh, you try to kick or hit someone with a lot of methods, and you're going to hurt yourself… and sure, Tae Bo doesn't claim to be a martial art… but that wasn't the point. The question was always what you were labelling as combatively derived ("fighting") components… so far, you haven't been clear on that. You're seeming to have a largely subjective definition… one where, if it doesn't match what you expect it to be, it isn't a martial art… I got news for you… there are lots of martial arts that don't match what you'd expect.
Actually I've been very clear cut. The fact that Tae Bo doesn't claim to be a martial art kind of makes my point for me, and fits right along with my entire argument.
To be blunt, I'd consider Iaido far more of a "martial art" than MMA, BJJ, or anything of the kind… but that's my perspective.
If you're using Elder's description of Iaido it most certainly is not. However, I would be very interested in hearing your argument for that, since I know you disagreed with Elder's description of Iaido earlier in the thread.
Meditation, conditioning, proper etiquette, care and maintenance of your uniform, including wearing it properly… of course, I might note that you have changed your parameters yet again…
You seriously don't see how those attributes don't improve your karate techniques?
Conditioning increases your endurance, coordination, flexibility, and toughness. All of which is important in performing technique.
Proper etiquette, Meditation, general cleanliness, respect, etc. is simply aspects of discipline and self control. Again, important parts of becoming a better fighter. You can look at any sports team or athlete who doesn't have good discipline or self control, and they tend to be pretty terrible at their sport because the lack of self control and discipline seeps into your actual ability to perform.
Sure… I'd say that's a fairly liberal usage of the term "enemy", but I come from a rather different background… where that term is very specific, and has some quite clear-cut implications that go well beyond what you're talking about…
So you wouldn't consider someone trying to attack you or your family and possibly trying to take your life an "enemy"?
That wasn't the definition you gave earlier… that was the point. The definition you gave was incomplete and inaccurate… it wasn't that BJJ wasn't a martial art, or didn't involve fighting in a particular context, it was that your given definitions were lacking. Again, you missed the context of what was being said.
I took the liberty of going back and looking up the definition of fight I gave earlier (actually Danny T gave it, but anyways...)
: to use weapons or physical force to try to hurt someone, to defeat an enemy, etc. : to struggle in battle or physical combat
: to be involved in (a battle, struggle, etc.) involving the exchange of physical blows or the use of weapons.
Physical force to hurt someone or defeat an enemy= Bjj.
To struggle in battle or physical combat= Bjj
To be involved in a battle/struggle, etc. involving the exchange of physical blows= Bjj.
Your context was that Bjj doesn't fit the definition of fight that I was using. Its not that I didn't understand the context of what you were saying. Its that the context of what your were saying was wrong.
Okay. They were an almost unheard of aspect in the Gracie lineage I trained in… and what I've seen have been very unimpressive… but, of course, there's no reason to bring up the fact that an art that specialises in one area might be lacking in another…
So..... they're almost unheard of in what you trained in, yet the Bjj strikes you've seen were unimpressive to you?
Okay.... So are we in agreement that there IS striking in Bjj?
If you observe the Gracies in action vids, there's plenty of striking being done by the Gracies and their students. Is it pretty? No. Is it effective? Yes.
Because I can see what's in the video, I can recognise when it's Judo or not, I can see the throws in karate, and so on. Oh, and the comments on the video agree with me, for the record… pointing out that the throws/grappling methods shown are part of karate…
So you're saying that Judo doesn't teach hip throws and foot sweeps?
Interestingly, I've done both Karate and Judo. I have a black belt in Shotokan, and I took Judo briefly in college, and I continue to take Judo since its offered at my Bjj school. The first time I learned a hip throw was in Judo. The second time I learned hip throws was in Bjj. I never learned hip throws or any throws for that matter, in Karate.