- Thread Starter
- #301
Better picture
Serious question -- what the heck is that used for?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Better picture
If I were talking to a police officer and I was asked just as you stated, I'd do so without hesitation.
But to my knowledge, there's no law compelling me to, nor is refusal to do so a reason to be taken to the ground, as was suggested above.
I know that some shootings in major crime cites are with semi-automatic weapons, with reports locally of a bad guy using one in each hand to shot at police. This was the reason it made the news, they used one in each hand.
I want that for driving on the I35 in Texas.Better picture
My last post in this thread for a while. So you're telling me that if you were a cop and you were going to make an arrest and told the person to get out of their car or if they were already out and you told them to turn around and put their hands behind their back, and they refused, after you repeatedly asked them, that you would not take them down?
Busting down reinforced doors in crack houses, drug labs, and dealing with riot situations.Serious question -- what the heck is that used for?
True.
But "I'm black, so all cop are out to get me" is equally lame.
But lets back up a moment. You said you were in the military.
What unit, when, where'd ya serve, etc.
Moving forward, maybe the problem is the huge ****ing chip on a rather large group of peoples shoulders, thinking that they are somehow entitled because up to 140 or so years ago their ancestors picked cotton and tobacco, and that respecting others is somehow beneath them as is proper grammar.
andBlacks were 6x more likely than whites to be a victim of crime
Um... how does that work? :idunno:Whites are more likely to know or be related to the victim than blacks
You spoke about questioning, not about arresting. To my knowledge, if someone is being placed under arrest, they pretty much have lost all right to not do as instructed (unless such instruction violates retained rights, such as 5th amendment protections).
Some other things I'd love to know.
How old are you?
How many times have you had these bad cop encounters?
How old were you then?
Where were you when this happened, what time was it, etc?
Add to this the "I'm entitled" chip on the shoulder attitude, the poor grammar, and the macho attitude, and it explains why you have so many confrontations.
I wasn't doin nuthin". Yo! Holmes! The sign that you can't read because reading is "fo suckas" says why you need to move your ignorant and illiterate ***. The "Whatchu gonna do" 'tude is making me nervous, and the "in my face attitude" is causing me concern for my own wellbeing, as are your 5 friends who are trying to out macho each other and intimidate me. 1 me, 6 of you, might be why my hands on my gun, and my radio is calling for backup. Sit down, shut up, answer like a grown up and not a spoiled piss pot, and maybe we can all go home to our families tonight, and not in a bag over something stupid like "street cred".
K.P. is also under the impression that if you are not under arrest that you are "free to go". In some situations that is true, but he is forgetting (or ignorant of the fact) that there are also investigative detentions where a police officer may detain an individual for investigative purposes if the officer believes, based on a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the individual is engaged in criminal activity, even if there is no probable cause to make an arrest. The officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which warrant that intrusion. A court reviewing the legality of such a detention must look to the whole situation when determining whether detention is justified and consider if the detaining officers had a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity. Refusing to show ID alone would not be enough, but added into the mix can raise the "pot" so to speak.
Thats the law in most states.
But I'm a bigot for refering to the jobs done by one vocal groups ancestors. Ok, I'm sorry, they all worked at the Confederate Stars N Bars Bucks, I'm so stupid to get history wrong like that.
el brujo de la Cueva said:Which, I guess is what it comes down to-most cops are o.k., some are great, and some are real dicks. I don’t know which one I’m dealing with….
So given the tense nature of the situation, why not, if being questioned, do what you could to make things easier, for both you and the cop? Is taking your hands out of your jacket, where a knife could be, too much to ask?
Why should the government be able, at certain times and places, to be able to tell you that you may or may not stand there or do that?Why?
I mean that as a serious question. Why should the government be able to tell me how I can or can not stand in public? I know you probably don't think of yourself as the government, but you are. When the state starts thinking they have the right to tell people how they may or may not stand, we've pretty well given up any meaningful rights at all.
That said, I would think that a polite request of something like, "Would you mind taking your hands out of your pockets, it's making me nervous." Or something along those lines would be complied with by most people. And failure to comply with a simple request would (and should) make the officer a bit more alert, but is it against the law for someone to stand how they like while answering a question?
Elder, I think that this quote makes quite possibly the most profound statement of the entire thread. You can't control any one else in a truly meaningful manner. You can, however, attempt to control their reactions to outside stimuli by not giving them any negative input.I dont know which one Im dealing with when I get pulled over, or have to otherwise deal with them, but I can control which of me theyre dealing with, so I do.