Those are some nice kicks in the video.
You are talking about Hapkido from GM Ji, Han-jae's lineage (pre or post Sin Moo), which has some unbelievable kicks.
In my previous post I was talking about Hapkido not from GM Ji's lineage (more from Choi, Yong-sul dojunim). Here we have very few kicks and 90% of them were below the waist. Depending on where you stand that could be seen as a positive or a negative.
I stand by my previous post. BUT, in hindsight, I could have been more specific. My bad.
Moo Sul Kwan hapkido also has dynamic kicking.
For what its worth, GM Ji was not alone responsible for adding in the dynamic kicks.
According to Dakin Burdick (and this information is substaniated by other accounts, fwiw):
Around 1958, both Choi and Suh opened their own schools in Taegu City. Yong-Sul Choi had been teaching privately on straw mats in the courtyard of his home since 1953. Among his pupils were Han-Jae Ji (then a freshman at Taegu City Technical High School) and Mu-Hyun Kim (aka. Mu-Wung Kim, Moo-Woong Kim, Moo-Moong Kim). Around 1958, Choi started his own tojang in an old dancing hall. Suh sold his brewery and opened a hapkido school at Chung-ang-dong, hiring Mu-Hyun Kim (then 21 years old) as his head instructor. Kim later moved to Seoul, where “he went to some temple to develop his kicking techniques which originally Hap Ki Do never had much of.” According to Kimm, Mu-Hyun Kim was known as a kicking specialist, and it was during his eight month stay in Seoul at Ji’s school that Hapkido’s kicks were finalized.
The Suh is Bok-Sup Suh, Choi's first student.
The Kimm is Dr. He-young Kimm
Kim (Mu-hyun) also taught at the (Korean) Musulkwan founded by Kwang-Wha Won, a student of Suh (and Choi). Dakin writes that:
Kwang-Wha Won was the personal secretary and bodyguard for Congressman Dong-Jin Suh from 1954 to 1958. Won learned yukweonsul from Bok-Sup Suh. Won moved to San Sun Kyo, Seoul, and opened his own school (Musulkwan) after teaching at Mu-Wung Kim’s tojang in 1962. Notable students were Lee-Hyun Park (a professor at Southeast Missouri State University), He-young Kimm, Hyung-dae Won (Won’s son and head of the Musulkwan after his father’s death). Musulkwan training specialized in short stick, knife defense, powerful and direct armlocks, defense against right hand attacks, big circle throws.
Lee-Hyun Park is, of course, the same late Lee H. Park who founded the (American) Moo Sul Kwan.
FWIW, GM Ji is a giant in the history of hapkido. It doesn't diminish him any to note that Kim was ALSO key to developing HKD's dynamic kicking.
I would hope that in the future his name is not forgotten in discussion of hapkido's dynamic kicking and that credit is given where credit is due in future discussions.
In my opinion, hapkido's dynamic kicking is "young man's hapkido" that is great for pushing athleticism in training, intimidating to opponents when dealing with multiple attackers, and
extremely effective finishing techniques for those who invest the time and training to make use of these tools feasible.
I am finding myself transitioning to an "older man's hapkido" where I believe myself to be less and less likely to grab these particular tools (at least, the flashier ones
) if forced to defend myself.
BUT I think
(HERE is where I bring it back "on topic"
)
that keeping these kicks within the curriculum is very important.
It is true that not everybody will be able to use them. But some can and will, and I don't think we, today, should deprive future generations of hapkido'in with the opportunity to train them and decide for themselves if they want to put those tools to use.
They ALSO have value in pushing us (as hapkido'in) physically. To me, training difficult kicks, makes the basic kicks seem easy in comparison.
Those who ONLY train the easy stuff may end up feeling as if THOSE are difficult — making even the basic kicks hard and maybe even not useable.
THAT is my objection to decisions by ANYONE to "pare down" and eliminate techniques from hapkido to come up with what THEY believe to be a smaller, practical curriculum.
Just because an individual — grandmaster or not — finds a technique not useful for THEM doesn't mean it might not be perfect for a future hapkido'in.
I would not ever presume to eliminate something from MSK hapkido, whether I think it works or not. Maybe the problem is with ME, not the technique.