slingblade01
Yellow Belt
Ah, intelligent discourse!
I would have agreed with you about 10 years ago.
However, the more I learn, the more I revise my opinions.
First point, if we look at a successful model to guide us, look at our academic structure. Some individuals don't go to college. Some go to tech schools while others go on to college. Let's focus on college. The first two years, you obtain a well rounded education - core classes. The next two years, you focus on your field of study - your major, and that is usually fairly specific. If you choose to continue a post-grad education, then you may specialize even further.
So you can see, based on this simplified academic model, a chemical engineering student concentrates on his specialization after two years of a well rounded education. He's not bogged down with english, poli-sci, history, etc. This is how we build professionals in industries. This model is centuries old and global accepted. Without this model, we would not have professionals and high achievement/ advancements in industry.
Second point, how much time do you think it takes to become a world/olympic champion? How long do you think the journey takes?
Hint - they are professionals in their industry.
Let me appproach this from adifferent angle. Many of you may know or are training under Grandmaster so-and-so who was a former world champion. Some of you may be shocked to learn that once they aquired their black and were able to make the elementary/ middle school team, they were done with poomse, one steps, kyuk-pa, whatever. All they did was train for tournaments. This is the model currently, and sinces the 70s, used today in Korea. Prior to then, in the old kwan days, some athletes did do a limited amount of poomse to keep up appearances. Now another question, did G.M. so-and-so turn out so bad? Is he a bad instructor/ person?
I completely agree!
Gymnastics uses a similar method. I seriously wish this would happen but I honesty don't think it will in this country, nor will Korea allow it to happen.
Anyhow, I disagree about the competition and the traditional being separated. I know that I'm probably the odd one out on that, but I feel that the sport competition is extremely useful for developing kicks, probably the single most effective tool for developing effective kicks in real time. While I feel that the woes of one affect the other, the reverse is also true; tradition and sport can enhance eachother.
I would have agreed with you about 10 years ago.
However, the more I learn, the more I revise my opinions.
First point, if we look at a successful model to guide us, look at our academic structure. Some individuals don't go to college. Some go to tech schools while others go on to college. Let's focus on college. The first two years, you obtain a well rounded education - core classes. The next two years, you focus on your field of study - your major, and that is usually fairly specific. If you choose to continue a post-grad education, then you may specialize even further.
So you can see, based on this simplified academic model, a chemical engineering student concentrates on his specialization after two years of a well rounded education. He's not bogged down with english, poli-sci, history, etc. This is how we build professionals in industries. This model is centuries old and global accepted. Without this model, we would not have professionals and high achievement/ advancements in industry.
Second point, how much time do you think it takes to become a world/olympic champion? How long do you think the journey takes?
Hint - they are professionals in their industry.
Let me appproach this from adifferent angle. Many of you may know or are training under Grandmaster so-and-so who was a former world champion. Some of you may be shocked to learn that once they aquired their black and were able to make the elementary/ middle school team, they were done with poomse, one steps, kyuk-pa, whatever. All they did was train for tournaments. This is the model currently, and sinces the 70s, used today in Korea. Prior to then, in the old kwan days, some athletes did do a limited amount of poomse to keep up appearances. Now another question, did G.M. so-and-so turn out so bad? Is he a bad instructor/ person?
I do feel that sport only schools should dispense with belts and that tournaments should be like fencing, with a-e and u ratings (a being the top competitors and e being the lowest rating, while u simply means unrated). Ratings in fencing go up and down depending on competition record and competition frequency (if you're undefeated for five years and then don't compete for two after that, you aren't 'a' rated anymore).
I completely agree!
Gymnastics uses a similar method. I seriously wish this would happen but I honesty don't think it will in this country, nor will Korea allow it to happen.