When is a Master

I think just looking at the years is a bit misleading. If you look at the hours involved, undergraduate study generally amounts to at least a half-time job, while doctoral study is equivalent to a full-time job. Meanwhile the average hobbyist martial artist trains probably 2-6 hours per week.

I'll assume that the sort of person who reaches 4th dan in TKD is more dedicated than the average student, so let's say they average 6-8 hours per week with no time off. That comes out to 3640 hours over 10 years. Certainly respectable.

In comparison, let's look at someone who completes a bachelors degree in 4 years and then a PhD in another 6 years (which is the average in the U.S.. Allowing for summer vacation during undergraduate study, that comes out to about 13260 hours. Significantly more.

To be sure, there are martial artists who train full-time. Someone who trains 20-40 hours per week for 10 years is likely to have really impressive levels of skill and knowledge. (Assuming it's quality training and not just going through the motions.) But these individuals are definitely the exception.

None of this intended to pick on you or on TKD. I see people in the BJJ community doing the same thing equating the years to get a BJJ black belt with the years to get a PhD, ignoring the fact that most BJJ black belts are not full-time professionals.
My first shifu (from . Some of his students started calling him master. He did not look at all comfortable with the title. Then one day he asked them to stop, and told them there are mo masters under 60. He was in his 50s at the time and started training when he was 5.
 
Sensei, Sifu, Coach, Master, Professor, Grand Master, Shihan, Doshi, Renshi, Tashi, Hanshi, Kyoshi, Kansho, Taiso, O-Sensei, Kru, Guro, Sabum, Sanumnim…I’m sure there’s some I’ve forgotten. (And please forgive the spelling.)

I’ll address anyone in the Arts anyway they want. Especially in their dojo. If we’re not in their dojo I’ll address them how they want to be addressed unless they’re behaving like an A-hole.

We sure got a lot of titles in this
world we all live and play in.
 
Sensei, Sifu, Coach, Master, Professor, Grand Master, Shihan, Doshi, Renshi, Tashi, Hanshi, Kyoshi, Kansho, Taiso, O-Sensei, Kru, Guro, Sabum, Sanumnim…I’m sure there’s some I’ve forgotten. (And please forgive the spelling.)

I’ll address anyone in the Arts anyway they want. Especially in their dojo. If we’re not in their dojo I’ll address them how they want to be addressed unless they’re behaving like an A-hole.

We sure got a lot of titles in this
world we all live and play in.
I prefer Lord High Omnipotant Grand Master Ruler of all I survey...... :)
 
My English professor at UMass taught us that
a B.S stood for you know what.
An M.S stood for More of the Same.
And a P.H.D. stood for Piled High and Deep.

She taught us a lot, had a lot of degrees and always made us laugh. Can’t ask for much more than that in a teacher.
 
My English professor at UMass taught us that
a B.S stood for you know what.
An M.S stood for More of the Same.
And a P.H.D. stood for Piled High and Deep.

She taught us a lot, had a lot of degrees and always made us laugh. Can’t ask for much more than that in a teacher.
That’s all true for arts subjects like English. 😑
 
It's not uncommon in BJJ, because "professor" is just Portuguese for "teacher". I don't use it myself because it has different connotations in English. Generally the only folks who have called me professor are either Brazilian or came up in BJJ under a Brazilian instructor, so I think it's a cultural thing.

I don't see much justification for use of the title in arts that don't come from a Portuguese-speaking country.
I fully agree with this. Even though most of my MA's experience has been in and around full blooded Korean 'Master' instructors, it never really moved my meter to be called a 'Master', even though I hold more than enough rank. It is too easily misunderstood and sounds rather arrogant to me. But I am from the south so I know opinions vary.
 
My son and wife both completed their bachelors degrees in three years. My daughter could do hers in three years, but she's choosing to do a sandwich year in industry before her final year making it 4.
Andy, I think this argument over the years typically required to attain university degrees comes from a basic misunderstanding. You are posting from the UK and many other forum members are coming from the States. We have slightly different educational structures.

Secondary or high school students in the States complete 12 years of elementary and secondary education combined and and are typically 17 (or just barely turned 18) years of age when they "graduate". This is the norm, whether students are university bound or heading into the workforce.

Therefore, the standard bachelor's program here is four years, and often takes five these days. To graduate in less than four years in the US would require special permission in many institutions, especially traditional "four-year residency colleges" and universities like the one I attended. Graduation in less time can happen, but it's highly unusual.

It's my understanding that in the UK (and optionally in Canada), university bound students take a 13th year (sixth form) of secondary school before proceeding to study at (the) university. So students on your side of the pond, essentially enter (the) university with a year under their belt while Americans are typically required to take a full year of "general education requirements" before entering their individual field of study or "major". BTW, most Americans, even those in education fields, are unaware of this difference, so that may be the issue here.

I am a secondary school teacher in the States, but I know of these systemic differences only because my older brother completed a fellowship at Oxford that translated to a "master's degree" in the American system and I guess he learned a bit about your system from his schoolmates over there. Otherwise, we Yanks are a pretty provincial lot and don't travel much out of our own continent. For one thing, it's expensive. And, then there are also those of us here who just don't care much about the world at large. :(

Personally, I like to think that we martial artists should be a little less benighted. Either way, if I didn't yet the details right, sorry. I'd be glad to have you put me straight on this! :)

BTW here's my source for comparing our systems and what in the US has traditionally been called a "Four year Bachelors degree" vs. that which in the UK is apparently referred to as a "Three year Bachelors degree":

 
Last edited:
The Scottish higher education (where I did my higher education) is very similar to the American system. University is 4 years long with four different minor subjects taken in year one, three subjects in year two before specialising in one of those three for the final two years and gaining an ‘honours’ degree. One can do just three years but leaves with an ‘ordinary’ degree.

I think it’s a better than the English system because there’s more opportunity for a broad initial education before specialisation, producing well-rounded individuals than there is in the English system of ‘immediate’ specialisation.
 
I think it’s a better than the English system because there’s more opportunity for a broad initial education before specialisation, producing well-rounded individuals than there is in the English system of ‘immediate’ specialisation.
I strongly support giving students a broader education before they specialize or declare a "major", or basically what we used to call a "liberal arts education". It's a term that is now associated with lazy kids who want to hang out in school for years, partying and putting off commitment to a job and "pulling their weight" in the "real world".

That's a misunderstanding of the objectives of a liberal arts philosophy which offers the student and society myriad benefits. There's more to this than merely giving a student time to settle into the right "major". At the most basic level, a broader understanding of diverse subjects encourages a wider perspective and questioning "pat" assumptions with "out of the box" thinking supported by a diverse knowledge base. It's something that has fallen out of fashion in recent years with the push towards training students for a specific career or vocation.

I wonder how this liberal arts philosophy would work if applied to the martial arts? What would a generalized, liberal arts approach to MA instruction look like? 🤔
 
Last edited:
I wonder how this philosophy would work if applied to the martial arts? What would a generalized, "liberal arts" approach to MA instruction look like? 🤔
Aikido 😐
 
Just aikido? No you would need a more diverse curriculum!

For starters, wouldn't you want to have a foundation that would include ti da shuai na (kick, punch, throw, lock) i.e. varying ranges and methods as addressed by the arts of different cultures. And you'd need some training in various weapons as well. Out here, firearms training is de rigueur. Of course, some HEMA and historical Asian weapons systems would need to be included too.

Regardless, you'd have some exposure to both Eastern and Western martial traditions, comparing ancient and contemporary approaches, including today's competitive martial sports such as Muay Thai and boxing to BJJ or Catch. And of course, there'd be required reading of the Eastern and Western martial classics, ranging from Sun Tzu to Xenophon, and Musashi to Machiavelli.

If you make it through that survey or "foundation" to complete your "gen ed." requirements, then you'd pick your major. Interesting, but way too much work. I'd find one thing I liked and drop out! :p
L
 
Last edited:
Aikido? No you would need a more diverse curriculum!
They do swords and striking and throws and locks. Other than grappling, what else is there?
 
They do swords and striking and throws and locks. Other than grappling, what else is there?
...er, Martial Farts??? ...Hey, don't ask me. I didn't have the benefits of a liberal arts education in the martial arts, so I didn't know that Aikido had all that. :(

...but now I do. :)
 
Andy, I think this argument over the years typically required to attain university degrees comes from a basic misunderstanding. You are posting from the UK and many other forum members are coming from the States. We have slightly different educational structures.

Secondary or high school students in the States complete 12 years of elementary and secondary education combined and and are typically 17 (or just barely turned 18) years of age when they "graduate". This is the norm, whether students are university bound or heading into the workforce.

Therefore, the standard bachelor's program here is four years, and often takes five these days. To graduate in less than four years in the US would require special permission in many institutions, especially traditional "four-year residency colleges" and universities like the one I attended. Graduation in less time can happen, but it's highly unusual.

It's my understanding that in the UK (and optionally in Canada), university bound students take a 13th year (sixth form) of secondary school before proceeding to study at (the) university. So students on your side of the pond, essentially enter (the) university with a year under their belt while Americans are typically required to take a full year of "general education requirements" before entering their individual field of study or "major". BTW, most Americans, even those in education fields, are unaware of this difference, so that may be the issue here.

I am a secondary school teacher in the States, but I know of these systemic differences only because my older brother completed a fellowship at Oxford that translated to a "master's degree" in the American system and I guess he learned a bit about your system from his schoolmates over there. Otherwise, we Yanks are a pretty provincial lot and don't travel much out of our own continent. For one thing, it's expensive. And, then there are also those of us here who just don't care much about the world at large. :(

Personally, I like to think that we martial artists should be a little less benighted. Either way, if I didn't yet the details right, sorry. I'd be glad to have you put me straight on this! :)

BTW here's my source for comparing our systems and what in the US has traditionally been called a "Four year Bachelors degree" vs. that which in the UK is apparently referred to as a "Three year Bachelors degree":

Great post.

TN has had a program called HOPE where kids can who make the grades can take a special program their last 3-years of grade school and enter college with the equivalent of an (special) Associates degree. To keep it valid, they have to complete their Bachelors in the same field. It has seen marginal success at best, I think because most kids just are not certain what degree they want to pursue at 14-years of age. It is part of the lottery system TN has had for several years now.
Good or bad? Honestly, I cannot tell a lot of difference in the end results for number or college graduates, etc...
It does appear to be a new conduit for kids who just don't want to enter the work world would rather keep goofing off in school.
 
You see different individuals calling themselves master, at what stage is it acceptable and does that affect their own Ego. You come across the arrogance then stumble across a Web page and get astonished by how some overvalue themselves. If you fancy a seminar with one for example, take out your bank loan and do it. This guy I heard say women can't do wing chun as they are not strong enough? So just let them join in for fun. Wow 😕

If you call yourself a master, you ain't one. It's something other people call you, not something you call yourself.
 
Sensei, Sifu, Coach, Master, Professor, Grand Master, Shihan, Doshi, Renshi, Tashi, Hanshi, Kyoshi, Kansho, Taiso, O-Sensei, Kru, Guro, Sabum, Sanumnim…I’m sure there’s some I’ve forgotten. (And please forgive the spelling.)

I’ll address anyone in the Arts anyway they want. Especially in their dojo. If we’re not in their dojo I’ll address them how they want to be addressed unless they’re behaving like an A-hole.

We sure got a lot of titles in this
world we all live and play in.
Sensei is a perfectly acceptable title to be used in our dojo when addressing the teacher. Yes, some of them have higher honorific titles but they are fine with Sensei. In my old Aikido dojo, the head of the school was called Soke. I don't hear that one too often.
 
.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0741.jpeg
    IMG_0741.jpeg
    81.6 KB · Views: 8

Latest Discussions

Back
Top