So much for letting me have the last word rofl!
That's up and coming.....I wanted to try one last time to amplify my intentions to you. I hold out the hope that it will not end up a superfluous effort.
The UFC comment was a snide comment about MMA yes
No.....it was not. Absolutely not. It was a snide comment about UFC.
then you chose to remind me that this thread was about TKD
That's exactly what it was about.......way, way back then.
somewhat sharply actually but you brought the subject up and showed a lack of knowledge about MMA, you confirmed this in a later post.
Ahhhh. Now I see the problem......I think.
I posted:
Furthermore, I'm being introspective about TKD.....and utilizing MMA by which to do so. I have all the respect in the world for those who practice MMA and their abilities, and I've said nothing different.
I must here and now apologize for a mis-type, and I do so humbly yet gladly. I meant to state that I was "utilizing UFC by which to do so". My intention was to maintain a separation between said and MMA.
The "pay attention" jab was just that.....a little snide perhaps. I don't consider that overly sharp, but for the mis-type, I do again apologize. I only wish that you had specifically pointed that out before now.
It's impossible to criticise incorrectly! No, it wasn't the broccoli thing. You posted first so I'm allowed to reply.
A universally accepted notion.
I'm allowed to be eccentric, I'm English.
I was actually talking about myself.
You've made some big assumptions about, not just me, but the people here.
Again.....that simply is not true. I haven't made any assumptions about you or anyone else. It is most emphatically not the case. You can repeat that over and over and there will still not be any bit of truth to that sentiment......or we could attempt to move on.
You came across as being superior in your beliefs and anyone who didn't agree was somewhat lower down the food chain than yourself.
Take a retrospective look back at my posts and you'll find more question marks than periods at the end of them. That is not the mark of grandiose boasting of superior beliefs. I still cannot believe that you didn't catch on to the fact that I was seeking challenges to ideas......not to attempt to force my own views, which are still incomplete......but to gain insight into what others are thinking.
The subject is whether one should include moralistic teachings into martial arts, most of think that we have been brought up properly, have our own moral values and therefore don't appreciate having mottos, phrases etc introduced into our training as if we were ignorant savages targeted by missionaries.
I hold the view that such teachings can and do have positive consequences. I don't understand why you would take such offense to said.....I do not see a code of sorts as questioning one's upbringing or values nor do I perceive the existence of a moral basis as rendering students "ignorant savages". Perhaps it can simply serve to reinforce that which we already hold important?
You have your opinion we have ours, discourse doesn't have to be acrimonious (see, I can do the big word thing too!)
.....and a good word it is.
but you came in waving your 'tenets' as if you were at war against the unbelievers.
.......and yet again, I was making inquiries.....not flag waving. Not all questions are rhetorical.
And you were surprised we didn't fall at your feet?
I am far too humble to even desire anyone to be at my feet.
My, even G-d and Constitution were on your side, amusing.
The reference to the Constitution was used as an example of how not to draw parallels in discussion. The comment was prefaced, as well as summarized, as such.
The conceit slips in and out of your words like a snake around prey.
If you look for something hard enough......you'll likely find it.
Was that also "pseudo philosophical bumpf"?
Good day.......submitted sincerely.