Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow. :barf:
I do not agree with it or do I condon such an act, but people have the right to be a stupid and dumb as they see fit here in America.
Plus the whole "Islam is a peaceful religion" BUT "don't burn the Koran because people are gonna die" thing seems contradictory.
Plus the whole "Islam is a peaceful religion" BUT "don't burn the Koran because people are gonna die" thing seems contradictory.
While I cant buy the idea that billions of people subscribed to it, one cant deny that the Salomn Rushdie and Muhammad Cartoon incidents illustrate a mindset different from the oddball X-tian Fundie who bombs an abortion clinic. There were street riots and religiously ordered assassinations.
You keep beating that drum, and never, once, admitting that Christians are, seemingly, required to put up with things that you, and others demand we insulate Muslims from, for our own safety.To you, perhaps. Bees generally don't sting. Smacking a hive with a stick tends to produce a less salutary effect.
Yes, there were.
One might consider that the average Muslim-in-the-street in many Middle Eastern countries is essentially uneducated (as Empty Hands has described quite well), itinerant, and poor. His or her country is backwards, desolate, isolated, and lacking infrastructure as well as economic opportunity. He or she does not have regular access to news sources other than rumor, hearsay, and the information spread by religious leaders.
In other words, this is not unlike Europe of hundreds of years ago. When they go to school, it is frequently to learn only the Koran, which they memorized by rote, word by word, until they can recite the entire thing on demand. They are given explanations for what the words mean - and these explanations are largely dependent upon what the prevailing version of Islam happens to be.
For the most part, Islam concerned itself with Islam. The average guy had a menial job, an arranged marriage, kids, and a place to live. His main concerns were feeding his belly and that of his family, and keeping God's law as he understood it; whether that was hair length, beard length, keeping his head covered, keeping his wife covered up, etc. His concern was not the USA. He may be what many of us would consider an ignorant savage, but he certainly wasn't a threat to us. Just as peaceful as the next guy, no particular interest in nor hatred of 'the West' or the USA. Why would they? In basic terms, the USA doesn't intrude into their world, for most part. You might have a McDonalds in the city, but most of the Islamic world doesn't live in cities; they live in what we would call rural slums, devoid of even basic things like paved roads, running water, indoor plumbing, and electricity. You think these people lay awake at night thinking about blowing themselves up to kill some infidels? But they are prime fodder to be recruited. This is not their fault - and there's not much we can do about it. It is what it is. It's like a natural resource for terrorists.
This is a base that the religious right in the USA does not have access to. No matter how poor some families and communities are in the USA, their poverty doesn't hold a candle to that of the Middle East. Even the poor go to school, have access to information, and most importantly, do not grow up with one book and one religious philosophy as their only yardstick by which to measure everything. As much as some fundamentalist Christians consider it their life, it's nothing compared to people who memorized their holy book when they were just kids and could recite it backwards and forwards before they were old enough to shave.
Now, you take that base and you give them access to radicals, who preach hatred towards the USA. They tell these people that the USA is their enemy and intends to destroy their culture, defile their women, insult their religion, trample their sacred symbols. And then, for those who don't believe the radicals, they give them just enough access to outside media to show them a fundamentalist Christian burning a Koran. There it is, the proof, right in front of their eyes.
Think a few radicals might be recruited out of that miasma? I do.
Christians don't incite the same reaction because here in the West, we don't have the same isolated, ignorant base of citizens from which to draw. One can listen to the bible-thumping moron on TV or switch the channel and watch Maury Povich or Judge Judy.
Knowing that many Muslims who are not economically advantaged and not located in the West are tools and pawns to be used by our actual enemies, one would be wise (I would have thought) to not give the terrorists additional ammunition to use against us. We are reacting just exactly as they would like us to react. As I mentioned before, that's called being a tool.
You keep beating that drum, and never, once, admitting that Christians are, seemingly, required to put up with things that you, and others demand we insulate Muslims from, for our own safety.
That is a positive thing really, Don.
Christianity is a more mature faith and one of the few good things about it is that the churches, in Europe at least, have gone through their vandalistic, trouble-making, 'teenage years' and can now be exposed to piquant criticism without the urge to burn everyone at the stake.
The societies it is within (except, possibly, America) would not stand for it if it did start to behave like the radical Muslim sects are.
[FONT="]I have no interest in attacking Islam or Muslims but as we accommodate the "Islamic minority" who, by the way, are already enjoying full equal rights, we neglect to see the plight of the Christian minorities in the Muslim world. These Christian minorities are in most cases the indigenous inhabitants of the land and not immigrants. Here in America, we are free to express our beliefs and opinions and we should stop bending our backs to Muslim or anyone.
[/FONT]
Then wouldn't Muslims, of all sects, having to suck it up and take piquant criticism, also be a positive thing? Kindly explain why when it is good for Christians to take criticism, and, indeed, derision, it is NOT OK for Muslims to be subject to the same?That is a positive thing really, Don.
Christianity is a more mature faith and one of the few good things about it is that the churches, in Europe at least, have gone through their vandalistic, trouble-making, 'teenage years' and can now be exposed to piquant criticism without the urge to burn everyone at the stake.
The societies it is within (except, possibly, America) would not stand for it if it did start to behave like the radical Muslim sects are.
Kindly explain why when it is good for Christians to take criticism, and, indeed, derision, it is NOT OK for Muslims to be subject to the same?
[FONT="]I have no interest in attacking Islam or Muslims but as we accommodate the "Islamic minority" who, by the way, are already enjoying full equal rights, we neglect to see the plight of the Christian minorities in the Muslim world. These Christian minorities are in most cases the indigenous inhabitants of the land and not immigrants. Here in America, we are free to express our beliefs and opinions and we should stop bending our backs to Muslim or anyone.
[/FONT]