I think this is an interesting topic to say the least, and at worst I will gain some insight from the elite coaches here who have athletes fighting at this level.
what I've noticed, and it's quite possible I'm entirely off base, based on 2012 Olympics in particular just because of how easy it was to watch them compared to most tournaments.
1) The current favorites are serious athletes, I guess that hasn't changed, but a lot of the fights looked like they were won and lost on cardio and muscular endurance. When I get my laptop fixed ill find a few examples, embedding on my cell phone is a nightmare
2) As much range as possible seems to be the order of the day. This one in particular, I'd like to discuss, because it seemed to me that the heavyweight division, a lot of countries were giving up technique in favor of range and strength. China in particular. Obviously the Chinese fighter is an excellent Taekwondo athlete, but in that company he didn't look quite as polished as the others, especially the lower weight classes. Some of the other fighters in men's heavyweight were similar.
For number two, as I think about that trend it certainly seems to be either changing or already changed, since the division in question (men's heavyweight) was won on pure ability and timing by Carlo Molfetta, who had easily the least reach in the group. Ties back in to number one as well, Carlo didn't win on athleticism, he won on fantastic Taekwondo.
What are you guys noticing? Working on? If you were to build an athlete in a lab for Olympic/World Gold, what would they look like? What division?
Edit: It was short sighted of me to talk to everyone like they were wtf people. Hope to hear from ITF, ATA, Independent, everyone. Let us know your ruleset though
what I've noticed, and it's quite possible I'm entirely off base, based on 2012 Olympics in particular just because of how easy it was to watch them compared to most tournaments.
1) The current favorites are serious athletes, I guess that hasn't changed, but a lot of the fights looked like they were won and lost on cardio and muscular endurance. When I get my laptop fixed ill find a few examples, embedding on my cell phone is a nightmare

2) As much range as possible seems to be the order of the day. This one in particular, I'd like to discuss, because it seemed to me that the heavyweight division, a lot of countries were giving up technique in favor of range and strength. China in particular. Obviously the Chinese fighter is an excellent Taekwondo athlete, but in that company he didn't look quite as polished as the others, especially the lower weight classes. Some of the other fighters in men's heavyweight were similar.
For number two, as I think about that trend it certainly seems to be either changing or already changed, since the division in question (men's heavyweight) was won on pure ability and timing by Carlo Molfetta, who had easily the least reach in the group. Ties back in to number one as well, Carlo didn't win on athleticism, he won on fantastic Taekwondo.
What are you guys noticing? Working on? If you were to build an athlete in a lab for Olympic/World Gold, what would they look like? What division?
Edit: It was short sighted of me to talk to everyone like they were wtf people. Hope to hear from ITF, ATA, Independent, everyone. Let us know your ruleset though
