Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... Shou (手), are those only defense and not offense?It is just turning on your feet from a solid, and rooted, neutral stance to block and/or strike.
1) pak sao and Wu sao
2) bong sao and wu sao
3) high low gang sao
4) tan sao and bong sao
HUH!?... Shou (手), are those only defense and not offense?
A: I train Tan Shou, Fu Shou, Bong Shou, Pak Shou, Wu Shou, Gang Shou, ...
B: I train jab, cross, hook, uppercut, overhand, back fist, hammer fist, ...
A: I train "iron shirt".
B: I train "iron palm".
A: I train "anti-grappling".
B: I train "grappling".
When A fights B, B will play offense and A will play defense.
It's a comparison between "defense approach" and "offense approach". It has nothing to do with you and I.I get it, you think your way of training is the best....
Should we emphasize "WC chain punches" training more than training such as Fu Shou, Tang Shou, Bong Shou?Everything in wing chun is offensive. It is only a matter of degree.
It's a comparison between "defense approach" and "offense approach". It has nothing to do with you and I.
A: I train Tan Shou, Fu Shou, Bong Shou, Pak Shou, Wu Shou, Gang Shou, ...
B: I train jab, cross, hook, uppercut, overhand, back fist, hammer fist, ...
A: I train "iron shirt".
B: I train "iron palm".
A: I train "anti-grappling".
B: I train "grappling".
As far as that goes..... yup, pretty much how one trains applications or how one sparsWhen A fights B, B will play offense and A will play defense.
Most MA systems have bothMost MA systems are defined by the offense skill and not by the defense skill.
IMO, you can't go wrong if you train your horse. Most wing chun folks ignore drills and exercise routines that build/enhance their horse.
As a person who periodically trains horses (as in actual horses) it always strikes me as funny when stance training is framed as training the horse.Hmmm. Like this?
OK, seriously now, you make a good point. On the other hand, different WC/WT/VT branches have very different ideas about what makes a proper stance and steps.
A way to look at wing chun training is not as training defence or offense but rather training things that are more genarlised.Should we emphasize "WC chain punches" training more than training such as Fu Shou, Tang Shou, Bong Shou?
One guy in Taiwan he trained how to hit a coconut that's tied between 2 trees for 1 year. A year later in a national tournament, nobody could escape his head hunting.
- Boxing is famous for jab, cross, hook, uppercut, ...
- TKD is famous for front kick, side kick, roundhouse kick, spin hook kick, ...
- MT is famous for roundhouse kick, elbow, knee, flying knee, ...
- Wrestling is famous for single leg, double legs, ...
- ...
Most MA systems are defined by the offense skill and not by the defense skill.
I is A or B. It's A talks to B. It's not I talk to you, or you talk to me.Then why all the "I"
However, this is a thread about Wing Chun..... just sayingI is A or B. It's A talks to B. It's not I talk to you, or you talk to me.
It's fun to talk about the subject. It's not fun to involve you or I in discussion. This is why it's not proper to ask people, "What's your style?", "Who is your teacher?", "How long have you trained?" Because those questions have nothing to do with the discussion subject.
When
- "I" is used in the post; people may say that you are self-center.
- "You" is used in the post; people may say that you try to shove your opinion into their throats.
Most of the time when "you" is used in my post, I try to say it's general YOU.
I is A or B. It's A talks to B. It's not I talk to you, or you talk to me.
Most of the time when "you" is used in my post, I try to say it's General YOU.
It's always interested to discuss the tradeoff.I always felt that its perfectly valid to discuss Wing Chun from an inclusive perspective, referencing concepts and principles as used in different branches, and even unrelated styles of martial arts. Also, it keeps the conversation lively.
Just curious, but:It's always interested to discuss the tradeoff.
The PRO of "连消带打 - defense and offense at the same time" (such as left Tan Shou, right punch) is you can combine offense and defense into 1 move.
The CON of this is, in order to do so, both of your arms have to extend forward at the same time. This can limit your power generation (you can't rotate your body when you punch).
But if we change left Tan Shou, right punch into grab-pull-punch, you can add that extra body rotation into the punch.
From the power generation point of view, left Fu Shou, right punch makes more sense than the left Tan Shou, right punch.
My understanding of Fu Shou (or Diao Shou) is grab-pull.Just curious, but:
1) what makes you think one can't rotate their body if they do a tan sao and a punch together
and if that's what you believe,
2) why is it then possible to do a fuk sao and a punch and rotate the body?
What!?you can't rotate your body when you punch
Fair enough, that's not like any fuk sao that I've ever learned.My understanding of Fu Shou (or Diao Shou) is grab-pull.
Tan Shou is a forward motion. Fu Shou (or Diao Shou) has pulling intend. In order to rotate your body, you (general YOU) need to have one arm moving forward and one arm moving backward.
Of course, you can turn 30 - 90 degree with Tan Shou and punch. But that's not enough turning for the maximum power generation.
Spent half a class in applications, all involved movement (foot work) and rotation with defense and attack. Spent another part of another class in front of a mook training 1 inch bunch, and the whole body turns from the rootIt's always interested to discuss the tradeoff.
The PRO of "连消带打 - defense and offense at the same time" (such as left Tan Shou, right punch) is you can combine offense and defense into 1 move.
The CON of this is, in order to do so, both of your arms have to extend forward at the same time. This can limit your power generation (you can't rotate your body when you punch).
But if we change left Tan Shou, right punch into grab-pull-punch, you can add that extra body rotation into the punch.
From the power generation point of view, left Fu Shou, right punch makes more sense than the left Tan Shou, right punch.
Tan-da sau can be a forward wedging movement, or a rotating movement using a turning stance. Either, if done properly, will generate good power. It's true that rotation combined with forward intent can add more power, but you don't need to rotate more than 45° to generate heavy striking power ...in Wing Chun or any other form of boxing! In fact, really good practitioners can generate power with very small movements.My understanding of Fu Shou (or Diao Shou) is grab-pull.
Tan Shou is a forward motion. Fu Shou (or Diao Shou) has pulling intend. In order to rotate your body, you (general YOU) need to have one arm moving forward and one arm moving backward.
Of course, you can turn 30 - 90 degree with Tan Shou and punch. But that's not enough turning for the maximum power generation.