Flying Crane
Sr. Grandmaster
Sure, and this is different from what I am getting at. If the five of you trained under the same lineage and have worked together for years, I assume you are teaching the same system and your concepts of the foundation is likely very very close, essentially identical. You are not teaching concepts that are in conflict with each other. You may each have things you emphasize, specific drills or techniques or technique combos that you prefer, but that is all still consistent with the foundation of the method. That works, and that kind of variety is enriching.Well there are 5 of us that teach and or take turns teaching. We all trained together for over two decades. We all have slightly different teaching styles and focus on separate aspects but I see it as beneficial because if a student can’t get what I’m saying they might get it better from one of my training brothers. None of us is the equal of our teachers but together we 5 make a Voltron teacher!
I am talking about people from different lineages, even within the same system, who understand the foundation and the fundamentals differently, and teach a student to do things one way that might be in conflict with how someone else teaches it. These conflicts can often be found between different lineages within the same system. They have developed in their own way over a few generations, and there has been some drift in the understanding and the technical standards. They may both work well, or one may work better than the other, but regardless, a student, especially at the beginner stages, needs consistency in what and how they are being taught. If they get conflicting messages from a different teacher every time they come to class, they will inhibit their development. That kind of variety is not enriching, it is confusing.