Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If I understood...
It is not just let do, is to give the opportunity to learn. First primary school. Then, eventually, college. Or do you start from the college until eventually succeed?
In other words, start easy, and increase the level, step by step. What is the point in being competitive when the level between 'opponents' is too different? It is the opportunity for the weaker to see how to do, and for the stronger to try absolutely new things (as examples). What is the point in being always competitive, repeating what we know and never trying alternatives because is risky? Or because, under pressure (and tired), people just don't think (properly)?
Definitely. After two people become good with the sweeps, it's almost mandatory to know how to counter it. It used to be that I could get away with one sweep, but the other instructor has gotten better so now I'm looking at countering his counter. The other students aren't at that level yet but maybe in two months. They'll be good to detect a counter. Right now they just think to much.In my last Shuai Chiao tournament, during the final championship fight, my opponent tried to use "foot sweep" on me 3 times. He succeeded once and was countered by my "single leg" twice. I still won that match.
When you teach "foot sweep" to your students, do you also teach them how to counter it?
yikes.I got punched in the throat in sparring today.
yikes.
I perform under pressure to check feasibility or progress, as I have been repeating several times. But not as the main way to learn. Beyond that, we agree.Being able to perform under pressure and tired is probably as important a fighting skill as technical ability.
Shying away from loss? I expose myself to vulnerable situations in training, just to learn how to manage these situations. (Example: in the ground I let my partners be close to clear advantage. too early defence may be too easy and without interest in training.)Otherwise shying away from loss makes it very difficult to progress.
Easy partners? I teach them how to defend my attacks. So both progress. And it is never easy when I force myself to be slower than my partners. I need to to be much more puzzling, and at the same time economise movements...Looking for easy sparring partners,soft training and no risk victory does not progress people as fast.
I have always believed that if you can beat up allLooking for easy sparring partners,soft training and no risk victory does not progress people as fast.
I have always believed that if you can beat up all
- elementary school kids,
- junior high school young boys,
- senior high school young guys,
- college adults,
- ...
- retirement home old folks.
you will develop some good MA skill. You should always start from easy and end with difficulty.
Shying away from loss? I expose myself to vulnerable situations in training, just to learn how to manage these situations. (Example: in the ground I let my partners be close to clear advantage. too early defence may be too easy and without interest in training.)
Easy partners? I teach them how to defend my attacks. So both progress. And it is never easy when I force myself to be slower than my partners. I need to to be much more puzzling, and at the same time economise movements...
That is one of very few weakness of this method. Great point! Others are loss of aggressivity and power.Sparring like that is very rewarding. Everybody has fun. But at some stage it has to stop or you create a separation between sparring and fighting.
The sparring doesn't have to be "what skill that you can apply on your opponent". It can also be "what skill that your opponent can't apply on you." For example, I will consider if I can use "single leg" to take my opponent down, I'm doing OK that day. I will also consider if my opponent's punches can't land on my head, I'm also doing OK that day too.But at some stage it has to stop or you create a separation between sparring and fighting.
That is one of very few weakness of this method. Great point! Others are loss of aggressivity and power.
But if we are aware of it, we can manage it in some way. And go harder from time to time to recuperate it.
The main issue is if your partners are not good enough, there is no point in 'kill' them all, all the time. Sometimes it is already quite humiliating, even going easy... So I go slow, they go faster and faster when they feel 'offended', and it becomes challenging to me. Or I use only one technique/leg... If they are better, I just look what they do (or ask to repeat). Think. Recreate the same situation and try a solution.
How many injuries did you already had training hard? Any special reason for training so hard?
Easy sparring partners? Now there's a novel idea.