TSDTexan
Master of Arts
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,881
- Reaction score
- 541
- Thread Starter
- #61
I've been following your post and still feel like this minor setback is for the best in the long run. Karate training in the most broadest sense belongs to you. If for some reason your Shihan seemed to think failing you at this level will be better for you in the long run it may be because he feels that you have more potential to
I'm following this thread and still completely agree with you and your outlook. What may look like unfair treatment may very well be a lesson in something else. You have your own students and prefer to have a high standard from what I understand. I don't think it is unreasonable to think that your instructor has higher expectations for you compared to the brown belt. It could be a factor of outlook and hence why comparing yourself to anyone else may not be helpful to your own development. I would explain it this way.......
A set criteria for everyone to pass or fail indicates a minimum required to pass to the next level. Not everyone is the same though. We all have different abilities or disabilities. Should I pass or fail because I am at a point in my life where I cannot do something that someone half my age can do with ease ? Under the bar of 'a set criteria' there is no judgement as to if a student is ready for the next level but that means you are nurturing students to meet a 'minimum standard'. There are instructors that grade their students to a more personal measure or against what they estimate is their personal potential. Grading with this outlook can produce students that will train to demonstrate their personal potential which may be a great deal higher than the average student.
Under 1 method of testing (ie: minimum standard) all belts should be therefore equal but the line will be close to the minimum standard required. Under the other method, all belts will not be equal as a more capable and effective belts will be challenged to what their perceived potential is.
I am not advocating one way over the other I am simply stating that there does not seem to be a universal set criteria to evaluate gradings and that I understand that instructors have their own reasons for making the decisions that they do. If you don't like it, change schools. Ultimately, you need to train in a place that appeals to you and that will satisfy your ideas on how to progress through the ranks. In your particular instance, as annoyed as you may be I think you can understand that there may be more to this decision than the apparent 'fairness' of the outcome.
I see no weakness in the path you chose. Quite the opposite. Osu !
Some great thoughts here.
The idea that he has higher expectations of me, than others has gone through my head a few times. Its good, to see that, i am not alone in that line of reasoning.