A lot of places teach ābeginnerā interpretations of kata movements, along side mid level and advanced interpretations.
Some people even claim this was an intentionally created feature of kataā¦something I donāt believe for a second.
However I understand aside from a few newer kata itās pretty much impossible to know original intent behind kata movements. This means your interpretation is just as valid and true as mine, assuming both make sense and can be practically applied. This does open the door to teaching multiple techniques of varying difficulty for the same movement or set of movements, which is fine.
My issue is that the beginnerās interpretations are often taught to simply mimic the movement from kata, including chambering an empty hikite, which plays no role in fighting in any sense, and which only builds bad habits, and harms the students ability to effectively apply a technique.
Some people even claim this was an intentionally created feature of kataā¦something I donāt believe for a second.
However I understand aside from a few newer kata itās pretty much impossible to know original intent behind kata movements. This means your interpretation is just as valid and true as mine, assuming both make sense and can be practically applied. This does open the door to teaching multiple techniques of varying difficulty for the same movement or set of movements, which is fine.
My issue is that the beginnerās interpretations are often taught to simply mimic the movement from kata, including chambering an empty hikite, which plays no role in fighting in any sense, and which only builds bad habits, and harms the students ability to effectively apply a technique.