The "accuracy" of HEMA

So you're in charge of how I should feel?
I don't care how you "feel." You are going out of your way to find insult where none was intended. That's not a feeling, that's just foolishness. ...or looking for an excuse to start a fight. Is that what you're doing? Trying to start a fight?
 
Neither do all SCA people who just play dressup only. Actually, it's most of the SCA people who don't. Like every year at Pennsic Wars where 10,000+ people show up and only about 500 show up in armor to fight. Same goes with the HEMA crowd, not a lot of them fight.
100% horse crap. The point of HEMA is to try to learn how to fight in historically accurate methods. The "MA" in HEMA stands for "Martial Arts." There's no HEMA bread baking classes which study the art of baking.

Now if you want to claim that some HEMA folks don't fight "well," or that some are insular and don't fight outside of their friends or the club they study with, OK, that's fine; argue that. But claiming that "not a lot of [HEMA practitioners] fight" is just flat wrong.
 
For the record, I'm interested in baking bread. Any medieval bread baking classes around?
 
For the record, I'm interested in baking bread. Any medieval bread baking classes around?
Honestly, check in with your local SCA chapter. I joined mine's fb group just out of curiosity, and get to see the events they do. One of the things that pops up every once in a while is medieval cooking classes, which may or may not include bread-breaking.
 
For the record, I'm interested in baking bread. Any medieval bread baking classes around?
Yes.


But I like the cheese better. It reminds me a lot of ricotta in flavor and texture. It's a bit grainier than ricotta but you could probably mash it or strain it to get a smoother texture. The flavor is very mild.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
 
Then can you tell me what this all means then?

"What separates HEMA from LARPing is a couple of concerns. First, we want our practice to reflect the way historical practitioners of these systems actually fought, rather than something we just dream up from our imagination. Second, we want to develop actual functional skill. So if we are studying a sword art then we would want to be able to effectively defend ourselves with a sword if we were attacked by an opponent who was also wielding a sword."
As I said before, I think he's referring to the fact that not all LARPers are concerned about functional skill. That many are doesn't change that this is a distinction between the groups. There are plenty of LARPers who just want to play, and some who just want to look cool. Both are worthwhile, but don't have that focus on usable skill.
 
For the record, I'm interested in baking bread. Any medieval bread baking classes around?
Check your local SCA branch. There's a lot more than just HEMA done by those groups.
 
Neither do all SCA people who just play dressup only. Actually, it's most of the SCA people who don't. Like every year at Pennsic Wars where 10,000+ people show up and only about 500 show up in armor to fight. Same goes with the HEMA crowd, not a lot of them fight
That may be true. You'd have to argue that with someone hwo knows HEMA better than I do. I'm just going off what Tony posted. His assertion is that HEMA has that focus.
 
Yes.


But I like the cheese better. It reminds me a lot of ricotta in flavor and texture. It's a bit grainier than ricotta but you could probably mash it or strain it to get a smoother texture. The flavor is very mild.

Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
How did I know you'd have links handy for these? 😁
 
Neither do all SCA people who just play dressup only. Actually, it's most of the SCA people who don't. Like every year at Pennsic Wars where 10,000+ people show up and only about 500 show up in armor to fight. Same goes with the HEMA crowd, not a lot of them fight.
SCAdians who "just play dressup" are a small minority. Sure, there are lots of people in the SCA who don't fight. But they do weaving, brewing, armoring, smithing, cooking, dancing, music... Those who "just play dressup" are most likely to be people who are very new to the SCA and haven't really figured out what, specifically, they are most interested in doing.
 
That may be true. You'd have to argue that with someone hwo knows HEMA better than I do. I'm just going off what Tony posted. His assertion is that HEMA has that focus.

I thought what he said, overall was pretty good; with the exception of him taking huge shots at LARPING. Which probably means that he's not that experience in HEMA.

He also took a shot a LARPING in another thread when I suggested to another guy who was training with a cane for SD; that he'd need to spar (which he didn't at all). He was worried to spar due to his older age, and I told him that LARPING is relatively safe as the weapons are foam padded & the skills do transfer over to real life. Your buddy said LARPING is fake, IIRC. So see, I'm not imaging things :p
 
As I said before, I think he's referring to the fact that not all LARPers are concerned about functional skill. That many are doesn't change that this is a distinction between the groups. There are plenty of LARPers who just want to play, and some who just want to look cool. Both are worthwhile, but don't have that focus on usable skill.

He didn't say many, he's talking about LARPING as a whole.

At LARP events, there are wives, girlfriends, children, etc. that dress up. But this is the same with SCA and HEMA as most women don't fight nor train weapons. We are both referring to those who trains to fight with weapons. Nobody really just want to look cool, we all don't want to lose in a 1 on 1 fight nor battle. It's very competitive.
 
I don't care how you "feel." You are going out of your way to find insult where none was intended. That's not a feeling, that's just foolishness. ...or looking for an excuse to start a fight. Is that what you're doing? Trying to start a fight?

No, it's actually foolishness for you to tell me how I should feel and keep insisting so; after you're being unable to refute what I argued.
 
I've said similar things about TMAs vs sport arts. When I read this, I think it's about priorities. The priority for HEMA is historical accuracy. That doesn't mean that HEMA prohibits imagination. It simply means that, where there is a conflict between imagination and historical accuracy, HEMA will lean to the latter.

Conversely, LARPing is all about imagination. Role playing is in the acronym, for Pete's sake. Anyone who's been to an SCA event or medieval fair knows that there's a lot of imagination involved, and that historical accuracy is involved, but a secondary consideration.

Yes, I have no problem with this nor what the OP said, overall, about what HEMA is.

I just have a problem with him taking a shot at LARPING and implying that the weapons training/fighting of LARPING is all fake. And he took a shot at LARPING in another thread (before this) about fighting with a cane, where I suggested to another guy to try LARPING for his sparring....and he said the skills won't transfer over, so really, I'm not imaging things. I chalk this up to his ignorance of LARPING.
 
Yes, I have no problem with this nor what the OP said, overall, about what HEMA is.

I just have a problem with him taking a shot at LARPING and implying that the weapons training/fighting of LARPING is all fake. And he took a shot at LARPING in another thread (before this) about fighting with a cane, where I suggested to another guy to try LARPING for his sparring....and he said the skills won't transfer over, so really, I'm not imaging things. I chalk this up to his ignorance of LARPING.
Sorry for taking so long to get back to reply to your comments in this thread and in the other one. I've been pretty busy this week.

Let me clarify my comments and see if we can get more on the same page. I'll also try to address some of your specific questions and concerns along the way.

Firstly, I would certainly never claim that LARPers don't have (or can't develop) genuine skill. It's a sport and anyone who works hard at a sport for long enough is going to develop skills. Some of those skills can potentially even transfer over to related activities if the individual makes the effort to experiment with those other activities and see what elements do and do not carry over. In the case of LARPing, related activities might include real stick fighting, SCA fighting, or HEMA.

What I said in the stick fighting thread was this:
LARPing is a lot of fun and good exercise and even has a bit of overlap with actual stick fighting skills, but there are important differences between LARP sparring and actual stick fighting. Being good at one does not make you good at the other.
You'll see that I stated that LARP sparring had both overlap and important differences with actual stick fighting. (I'll discuss the differences a bit later, possibly in a separate comment if this one gets too long.) I did not say that LARP sparring was fake, just that it was different. I will add that someone who understands the overlaps and differences between different systems of weapon sparring (LARP, SCA, real stick fighting, kendo, modern Olympic fencing, HEMA, etc) could use one as a form of supplemental training for the other. Some people do that. Other people engage in more than one of those activities just to enjoy each for its own sake. However being good at one of those does not automatically make you good at one of the others.

Have you tried both, extensively? I have, and spars this FMA instructor that runs his own school. He always comes to a sparring meet with a bag full of his propylene sparring weapons; but only 1 or 2 people want to play with weapons. With me using his weapons, that he's well used to, it was about 50/50 out of at least 20 exchanges.

My training is 15+ years of Muay Thai mostly + BJJ/MMA but only ~3years of Larping and nothing else formal for weapons. There are many Nerd Larpers that will beat me 70/100 times consecutively; despite my being much more athletic than them. The top 10% will beat me 80-90/100.
For the record, my primary arts currently are also BJJ + Muay Thai/MMA. My weapons background is primarily FMA & SCA, with some other stuff mixed in over the years. HEMA is a relatively new art for me. My group is focusing on Meyer, but I've played a bit with other systems. I did a little bit of LARP sparring (Amtgard) before the pandemic hit. The local Amtgard group just started back up in-person events a few weeks ago, but I haven't found time in the schedule yet to make it back, due to some family responsibilities. Hopefully I'll be able to slot that in sometime in the upcoming months. I don't claim to be a great fighter in any weapon art or combat sport, but thanks to 40+ years of martial arts training I'm generally able to jump in at better than the typical beginner level of sparring.
Larping is a real skill set as it's applying HEMA.
First part yes. LARPing is a real skill set. Second part no. There's nothing particularly historical about the sparring methods. I'm sure there are HEMA practitioners who also LARP and will slip in a historical technique if it works well under that particular skill set, but fundamentally the rules of LARP sparring are not designed or optimized to encourage the body mechanics, tactical approaches, or specific techniques of historical swordsmanship. Or to put it another way, the best training for surviving an historical fight with real swords is not the best preparation for excelling in LARP battles.

You could say much the same thing about modern Olympic fencing. Due to it's status as an long-time Olympic sport, it has a much deeper talent pool than HEMA, LARPing, or the SCA. The average skill and athleticism of serious competitors in the sport is well beyond that of their counterparts in HEMA, LARP, or SCA. That said, the sport has diverged considerably from its origins in actual swordplay. Some of the skills and attributes developed in modern Olympic fencing can still carry over and be very valuable in historical swordplay methods, especially small sword and certain rapier methods. Other aspects of the sport are very far removed from combative application and could lead to very poor outcomes in a real sword fight. None of that is to say that modern Olympic fencing is "fake" or that Olympic fencers don't have skills or even that a HEMA practitioner couldn't get some benefit from cross-training in modern Olympic fencing (so long as they understood which elements are transferable and which are not).

I need to take a break and get some dinner. After that I may have to head to the gym if my training partner doesn't cancel on me. Whenever I get back I can go into some detail on some positive aspects I think can potentially carry over from training in one weapon art or sport to another and other aspects which I think do not carry over. If I have time, I might even add some considerations of the limitations of HEMA tournaments in simulating historical swordplay and possible approaches for mitigating those limitations.
 
I thought what he said, overall was pretty good; with the exception of him taking huge shots at LARPING. Which probably means that he's not that experience in HEMA.

He also took a shot a LARPING in another thread when I suggested to another guy who was training with a cane for SD; that he'd need to spar (which he didn't at all). He was worried to spar due to his older age, and I told him that LARPING is relatively safe as the weapons are foam padded & the skills do transfer over to real life. Your buddy said LARPING is fake, IIRC. So see, I'm not imaging things :p
As I said earlier, you’re taking his comment as a personal attack. Not sure why you’re so worked up. It seemed quite different when I read it.
 
He didn't say many, he's talking about LARPING as a whole.

At LARP events, there are wives, girlfriends, children, etc. that dress up. But this is the same with SCA and HEMA as most women don't fight nor train weapons. We are both referring to those who trains to fight with weapons. Nobody really just want to look cool, we all don't want to lose in a 1 on 1 fight nor battle. It's very competitive.
I’ve known a few LARPers, including some re-enactors. None were concerned with usable skills. Some (the reenactors) we’re concerned with some level of historical accuracy, I assume some are also interested in working skills in whatever their area of specialty is.

I would have thought there’s a distinction between HEMA participants and the folks who hang around to role-play (who I’d have called LARPers or some such). Perhaps that distinction is only in my head.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top